Reaching the limit of transistors you can put on a chip

Started by: Ash | Replies: 19 | Views: 1,640

Ash
2

Posts: 5,269
Joined: Nov 2005
Rep: 10

View Profile
Aug 24, 2008 3:12 PM #232497
Stop thinking of it as a light switch and start thinking of it as a light dimmer. There's off completely, there's dim, and there's bright.

Instead of just off and on, you can think of it as "off", "setting 1", and "setting 2".

@Exilement: three setting transistors wouldn't just allow us to store more in less space, it would also make flash memory far cheaper.
MoD
Banned

Posts: 4,492
Joined: May 2008
Rep: 10

View Profile
Aug 25, 2008 1:14 PM #233297
Why not skip off to Quadrinary?

Its more logical, as an even number.
Ash
2

Posts: 5,269
Joined: Nov 2005
Rep: 10

View Profile
Aug 25, 2008 10:17 PM #233871
Quote from MoD
Why not skip off to Quadrinary?

Its more logical, as an even number.


One step at a time, man. First we need to develop an effective 3-mode transistor, then we can move along to a 4-mode one.
Fusion
Banned

Posts: 4,445
Joined: Aug 2008
Rep: 10

View Profile
Aug 25, 2008 11:44 PM #234031
and then get a Septenary(7) system. cuz seven is awesome. and it's not too much of a stretch.
Ash
2

Posts: 5,269
Joined: Nov 2005
Rep: 10

View Profile
Aug 26, 2008 1:41 AM #234197
There's a point where adding too many modes to a transistor will make it too fragile for active use. 4 is enough, and will be enough for tens of years most likely.