Well, when you throw around the word 'always'...
Well maybe saying that was generalizing, but I was just making a point to seek clarification as to the difference between, say, disbelieving a deity can just come out of nowhere and how humans can just come out of nowhere (i.e. being born, sperm cells, etc.).
Don't play it off as a simple remark. You brought atheists into a debate that had nothing to do with them. Which Is what I would call an attack. It would be like you talking about fruits and I come in and say "Orange believers always try to make it seem like grapefruits are totally stupid...." Uncalled for and irrelevant hostility.
So just because someone brings something up in a topic that isn't completely based on it, that means it's an attack? Do you realize how that sounds? And that example you used isn't even a good example. If you would not take what i said out of context, I never said "all you try to do is disprove religion". Maybe I should've worded it a bit differently so that people wouldn't see it as an attack, but I was only stating one of the subjects I usually here atheists use when in an argument about religion.
@Bold: How would you know what goes through an atheists mind if you aren't one? I cant account for all atheists, nor any other than myself, so I cant answer that question.
Maybe because I've heard them say it before? You can't account for my experiences with atheists, so you can't
ask that question. What you think that atheists and religious followers are on two completely different intelligence levels and in order to comprehend the articulate nature of an atheist's wording (that
obviously cannot be followed by the likes of a lowly, moronic Bible-hugger), I must become an atheist?
See? By thinking on your terms, I could take that statement as an insult.