Its really short, but animating this way takes a long time. Dont comment on the physics, I needed the ball to land within certain frames, so It doesn't look right.

Who thinks I should use this style?

http://www.truploader.com/view/706083

CC please.

The ****? What style is there? Anyway it was good until he broke his front leg and he landed in a way he would break his back leg. Also the ball sticks to his leg, weird. But the arms were good looking. Also don't right {CRS} for 1, that could be anyone because you can't really abbreviate your name, and your not epic and only epic people should do so.

Quote from Flood

The ****? What style is there? Anyway it was good until he broke his front leg and he landed in a way he would break his back leg. Also the ball sticks to his leg, weird. But the arms were good looking. Also don't right {CRS} for 1, that could be anyone because you can't really abbreviate your name, and your not epic and only epic people should do so.

LOL, who told you only epic people should name their animation? It just tells the person who's animation it is that's all.

If they look under the thread title they can see the creator. Its just annoying when people put initials that have nothing to do with their username.

CRS CRonoS

The physics were WAY off.

Quote from Flood

The ****? What style is there? Anyway it was good until he broke his front leg and he landed in a way he would break his back leg. Also the ball sticks to his leg, weird. But the arms were good looking. Also don't right {CRS} for 1, that could be anyone because you can't really abbreviate your name, and your not epic and only epic people should do so.

**** you too lol. People put it there so you can see who's thread it is from the index page. Instead of being mislead by the person who posted last. Should i put {XIII} instead?

Thanks for the CC though. But why does everyone have a sad when I break the laws of physics, or make the stick move in an unorthadox style. I do things differently.

I don't care if you do it differently.


Does it look good? No.

Wonderfull critisism.

Harsh criticism much?

Quote from CronosXIII

Its really short, but animating this way takes a long time. Dont comment on the physics, I needed the ball to land within certain frames, so It doesn't look right.

Who thinks I should use this style?

http://www.truploader.com/view/706083

CC please.

Quote from MaxZ

The physics were WAY off.

Quote from MaxZ

Does it look good? No.

Thanks you so much for the CC MaxZ

I'm sorry, princess.

Your trolling has failed!

Don't point out your own flaws, it draws us to them.

Anyway, the back leg lagged too much on the landing, and it looked a bit floppy to me. Don't use a reflection on such a short test. In terms of "style", you can't tell from 10 frames. Make something decently long and then we can say whether the style is cool or not, but that said it looks solid, if you clearly indicate in the animation that the physics are off (by consistently showing so) and still make it look good then physics shouldn't matter.

To me the physics look off...

Thanks for the CC. Ill try put more effort in and make them longer.

well, what i said over ga. don't use brush, cause that would be my style. use line, if you must.