Don't smoke. It causes cancer monsters to form in your body.
/thread.
smawking
Started by: Automaton | Replies: 24 | Views: 2,033
Nov 23, 2009 9:24 PM #516732
Nov 23, 2009 9:53 PM #516751
Quote from New GenerationDon't smoke. It causes cancer monsters to form in your body.
/thread.
I agree, and for the weed its illegal... :heh:
Nov 24, 2009 12:56 AM #516833
Quote from SpoonedAw shit man I'm really sorry about that. You sure you're doing it correctly? Try to hold in the smoke your lungs as DEEEEP as you can, and for as long as you can, until you feel the energy creeping up your brain. Otherwise, just smoke more of it. You can't miss out on ganja man.
listen to this man
most common mistake new smokers make is to just breathe the smoke in to their mouth and then breathe it out. this won't affect you anywhere near as much as if you breathe it in all the way in to your lungs and hold it there as long as you can.
in fact, if you just hold it in your mouth you're just giving yourself mouth cancer, without even getting high.
Nov 24, 2009 3:15 AM #516881
Quote from SpoonedAw shit man I'm really sorry about that. You sure you're doing it correctly? Try to hold in the smoke your lungs as DEEEEP as you can, and for as long as you can, until you feel the energy creeping up your brain. Otherwise, just smoke more of it. You can't miss out on ganja man.
after around 7 seconds all the thc is already absorbed into your lungs and you're basically just suffocating yourself and killing your brain cells man. it gets you higher yeah thats true, but not in a good way.
Quote from New GenerationDon't smoke. It causes cancer monsters to form in your body.
/thread.
ciggs yes, but cannabis no. if actually helps fight cancerous cells. ( a hell of a lot of forms of cancer also, more and more are being discovered. recently it is said to help cancer of the bile ducts, which has like a 30% survival rate or something)
Quote from Scarecrowlisten to this man
most common mistake new smokers make is to just breathe the smoke in to their mouth and then breathe it out. this won't affect you anywhere near as much as if you breathe it in all the way in to your lungs and hold it there as long as you can.
in fact, if you just hold it in your mouth you're just giving yourself mouth cancer, without even getting high.
>:C CANNABIS DOES NOT GIVE ANY CANCER IN ANY FORM OR WAY, EVEN THE ****ING SMOKE.
but yeah what they said besides the cancer.
some people just have a natural tolerance for it, so that might suck for you. then again your friends might just be acting more high than they really are, thats a possibility.
what kind of weed are you getting?
and how long have you been smoking? if you're new than just smoke a couple more times, I remember it took my friend a hell of a lot of times before I actually got her high.
also whats this shit with mixing the two? you just don't do that man I don't care where you're from. it just ain't right. try it without and see how high you get.
also hiding your weed is easy as shit, there are a ****ton of places around your room. you just gotta be creative with your thinkin man.
Nov 24, 2009 6:30 AM #516950
It has been proven that cannabis smoke contains the same carcinogens as tobacco, and that cannabis smoke deposits tar in the lungs and throat in the same way tobacco does, but deposits more due to the lack of use of a filter
Therefore it is likely that cannabis smoke does in fact cause cancer
However, due to difficulty in producing accurate research, this has not been proven (many smokers of marijuana also smoke tobacco and therefore it is difficult to determine which is the cause), so i'm not going to say that you're wrong
it's just quite unlikely that you're correct in saying that cannabis doesn't cause cancer
Therefore it is likely that cannabis smoke does in fact cause cancer
However, due to difficulty in producing accurate research, this has not been proven (many smokers of marijuana also smoke tobacco and therefore it is difficult to determine which is the cause), so i'm not going to say that you're wrong
it's just quite unlikely that you're correct in saying that cannabis doesn't cause cancer
Nov 24, 2009 10:35 AM #517031
Quote from Cosmonautafter around 7 seconds all the thc is already absorbed into your lungs and you're basically just suffocating yourself and killing your brain cells man. it gets you higher yeah thats true, but not in a good way.
So basically the health concern with holding your breath for longer is basically issue of holding your breath for too long i.e. lack of oxygen? What about the thc itself, wouldn't that damage your lungs more if you held it in for longer?
Ah well, I just have the habit of holding in the smoke for a fairly long time, because I feel more efficient that way. Probably bad for me though yeah.
Nov 24, 2009 11:20 AM #517036
the thc enters your bloodstream through the lungs so the thc isn't in your lungs after that time
Nov 24, 2009 4:47 PM #517076
Quote from Cosmonaut
what kind of weed are you getting?
Don't know, my mates get it. He said it was "pukka".
and how long have you been smoking? if you're new than just smoke a couple more times, I remember it took my friend a hell of a lot of times before I actually got her high.
Haven't smoked weed for long. Only like 3 weeks a go, had about 4 spliffs since then.
also whats this shit with mixing the two? you just don't do that man I don't care where you're from. it just ain't right. try it without and see how high you get.
Mixing what? I don't mix anything...
also hiding your weed is easy as shit, there are a ****ton of places around your room. you just gotta be creative with your thinkin man.
Yeah, I never get my own weed, but I buy spliffs off people when I'm out (they can roll them better than me), so hiding weed isn't a problem. The cigarettes I just hide in my desk.
Nov 30, 2009 5:50 AM #519399
ha forgot about this
yes yes and yes to the first 3 things, what you are saying is pretty much what every other prohibitionist says when trying to say that cannabis causes cancer.
yes there are the same carcinogens, and yes its still smoke so it goes in the lungs. not as much as you make it seem though, they're pretty much the same level.
but what cannabis does have are other cannabinoids (HA **** you chrome i spelled it right!) that basically "eat away" (sorry for the idiotic term but that's what the article said and can't think of any other word) at the cancer causing shit yo.
"However, due to difficulty in producing accurate research"
actually there has been plenty sir, most don't hear of em because of virtually no press coverage. i really don't wanna look for it so I'm not going to, but take my word there are and I have read them, most i didn't understand because of the words longer than 8 syllables. always go to the research sir, from what i've learn on researching cannabis ignore most articles and go to the research papers.
"many smokers of marijuana also smoke tobacco and therefore it is difficult to determine which is the cause)"
i'm calling bullshit here man, i'm not saying that not a lot of people don't smoke both but first it's not nearly enough to blur the result. second if they are including anyone who smokes tobacco the entire result is worth shit. and third it causes question into what kind of research they are actually doing, from that description it sounds as if it's one of those polls where they just call a lot of people and ask questions or they are having a hard time finding someone doesn't do both which also makes me question the reliability of a lab who can't even find someone who doesn't smoke tobacco.
that is assuming of course that you copypasta and that's not in your own words, if it is nvm then.
also think of this, when was the last time you ever knew anyone who got cancer from weed? when was the last time you've seen on the news a tale of another death my cannabis lung cancer? because if someone was to die from cannabis alone you bet your ass the news, drug czar, dea and everyone else would be all over it. or maybe if they found someone with a black lung from weed alone they would be parading that through the streets like a ****ing parade.
that's all old science now anyways man, everyone knows cannabis doesn't cause cancer.
i try to hold in my breath in proportion to how good the weed is, the better it is the longer I hold it haha
pukka means good, you're friends told you it was good
yeah smoke more man, 3 weeks ain't too long
sorry, spliff means weed mixed with tobacco here. i dunno you might just mean a joint, or maybe that more skinnier joint.
you probably get ripped off that way, I don't know I've never bought it like that but it doesn't sound like a legit way of buying, even if they are your mates. just my opinion though, if it works for you then it's all good.
nothin like rolling a perfect j, then lighting it up and enjoying your hard work. :Love<3: :Love<3:
Quote from ScarecrowIt has been proven that cannabis smoke contains the same carcinogens as tobacco, and that cannabis smoke deposits tar in the lungs and throat in the same way tobacco does, but deposits more due to the lack of use of a filter
Therefore it is likely that cannabis smoke does in fact cause cancer
However, due to difficulty in producing accurate research, this has not been proven (many smokers of marijuana also smoke tobacco and therefore it is difficult to determine which is the cause), so i'm not going to say that you're wrong
it's just quite unlikely that you're correct in saying that cannabis doesn't cause cancer
yes yes and yes to the first 3 things, what you are saying is pretty much what every other prohibitionist says when trying to say that cannabis causes cancer.
yes there are the same carcinogens, and yes its still smoke so it goes in the lungs. not as much as you make it seem though, they're pretty much the same level.
but what cannabis does have are other cannabinoids (HA **** you chrome i spelled it right!) that basically "eat away" (sorry for the idiotic term but that's what the article said and can't think of any other word) at the cancer causing shit yo.
"However, due to difficulty in producing accurate research"
actually there has been plenty sir, most don't hear of em because of virtually no press coverage. i really don't wanna look for it so I'm not going to, but take my word there are and I have read them, most i didn't understand because of the words longer than 8 syllables. always go to the research sir, from what i've learn on researching cannabis ignore most articles and go to the research papers.
"many smokers of marijuana also smoke tobacco and therefore it is difficult to determine which is the cause)"
i'm calling bullshit here man, i'm not saying that not a lot of people don't smoke both but first it's not nearly enough to blur the result. second if they are including anyone who smokes tobacco the entire result is worth shit. and third it causes question into what kind of research they are actually doing, from that description it sounds as if it's one of those polls where they just call a lot of people and ask questions or they are having a hard time finding someone doesn't do both which also makes me question the reliability of a lab who can't even find someone who doesn't smoke tobacco.
that is assuming of course that you copypasta and that's not in your own words, if it is nvm then.
also think of this, when was the last time you ever knew anyone who got cancer from weed? when was the last time you've seen on the news a tale of another death my cannabis lung cancer? because if someone was to die from cannabis alone you bet your ass the news, drug czar, dea and everyone else would be all over it. or maybe if they found someone with a black lung from weed alone they would be parading that through the streets like a ****ing parade.
that's all old science now anyways man, everyone knows cannabis doesn't cause cancer.
Quote from SpoonedSo basically the health concern with holding your breath for longer is basically issue of holding your breath for too long i.e. lack of oxygen? What about the thc itself, wouldn't that damage your lungs more if you held it in for longer?
Ah well, I just have the habit of holding in the smoke for a fairly long time, because I feel more efficient that way. Probably bad for me though yeah.
i try to hold in my breath in proportion to how good the weed is, the better it is the longer I hold it haha
Quote from AutomatonDon't know, my mates get it. He said it was "pukka".
Haven't smoked weed for long. Only like 3 weeks a go, had about 4 spliffs since then.
Mixing what? I don't mix anything...
Yeah, I never get my own weed, but I buy spliffs off people when I'm out (they can roll them better than me), so hiding weed isn't a problem. The cigarettes I just hide in my desk.
pukka means good, you're friends told you it was good
yeah smoke more man, 3 weeks ain't too long
sorry, spliff means weed mixed with tobacco here. i dunno you might just mean a joint, or maybe that more skinnier joint.
you probably get ripped off that way, I don't know I've never bought it like that but it doesn't sound like a legit way of buying, even if they are your mates. just my opinion though, if it works for you then it's all good.
nothin like rolling a perfect j, then lighting it up and enjoying your hard work. :Love<3: :Love<3:
Nov 30, 2009 9:09 AM #519452
you're probably right w/e
that's what i just did
awwwwwww yeah
:Cool:
Quote from Cosmonautnothin like rolling a perfect j, then lighting it up and enjoying your hard work. :Love<3: :Love<3:
that's what i just did
awwwwwww yeah
:Cool: