Why Breaking Dawn (Twlight 4th book) Must Be Made Into A Movie
Started by: 2-D | Replies: 39 | Views: 1,769
Dec 15, 2009 7:13 PM #524905
Wait what.
Dec 15, 2009 7:51 PM #524924
Quote from ZedWho were you before?
Umm.......i dont understand that question could you please rephrase it in such a way that you convey your uncertainty in a more comprehendable manner.
Dec 15, 2009 7:59 PM #524925
Well, given that you made a statement asserting a near loss of faith in the member known as 2-D, quoted thusly as confirmation:
...it stands to reason that you must have, at some point, had a degree of faith in the aforementioned member. This is logical, as you could not lose what you did not, at one time, posses. This "loss of faith" as you articulated it, is taken to imply that the title of this thread was out of character with him. As such, one must assume that you had had some prior form of contact with 2-D. Few paradigms for such contact exist besides having been a previous member on this site. Alternatively, I am prepared to entertain the possibility that you know him in that strange heathen land of "real life" or from another forum, although given the number of new members we get against the number of people 2-D knows, this seems unlikely. The most logical explanation was, from my perspective, multi-accounting. Correct me if I'm wrong.
Quote from aakash77i almost lost faith in 2-D when i saw the post "Why Breaking Dawn (Twlight 4th book) Must Be Made Into A Movie" and deemed it untrue so i checked it out and the person who wrote that article is a hero in my books
...it stands to reason that you must have, at some point, had a degree of faith in the aforementioned member. This is logical, as you could not lose what you did not, at one time, posses. This "loss of faith" as you articulated it, is taken to imply that the title of this thread was out of character with him. As such, one must assume that you had had some prior form of contact with 2-D. Few paradigms for such contact exist besides having been a previous member on this site. Alternatively, I am prepared to entertain the possibility that you know him in that strange heathen land of "real life" or from another forum, although given the number of new members we get against the number of people 2-D knows, this seems unlikely. The most logical explanation was, from my perspective, multi-accounting. Correct me if I'm wrong.
Dec 15, 2009 11:02 PM #524976
You good sir, have just been "Zeded".
Dec 15, 2009 11:50 PM #524984
he's been around since September.
i'm sure he knows me a little bit since then.
ya dig, zed?
i'm sure he knows me a little bit since then.
ya dig, zed?
Dec 16, 2009 7:30 AM #525086
all i have to do to prove anything is say that i have read the twilight debate thread in the debate section
Its quite self explanatory.
Its quite self explanatory.
Dec 16, 2009 9:08 AM #525120
it sure is
Dec 16, 2009 9:31 AM #525130
Dec 16, 2009 10:09 AM #525131
You know I was having a hearty smile until I read this.Quote from Etch
I finish Breaking Dawn and, the only reason i stand the whole Jake/Renesmee thing, is because i REALLY like jake and i didn't want him to end up all alone and sad.. otherwise.. is just weird !
****ing Twilight fans.
Dec 16, 2009 12:00 PM #525142
i don't want you to be alone fictional character i'm in love with! so i accept your extreme baby philia!!!!