Frisbees for Hands or Skis for Feet?
Started by: Dinomut | Replies: 15 | Views: 872
Jan 19, 2010 4:49 AM #538516
Would you rather have hands that are frisbees or feet that are skis? Think this one over for a few hours before you vote, as the consequences of either side are quite catastrophic. Don't feel rushed, as you have until March of 2012 to make your decision.
Jan 19, 2010 7:26 PM #538677
I chose both.
WWWWWWWOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH
WWWWWWWOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH
Jan 27, 2010 6:09 PM #541090
Both would really suck. know real control over a keyboard with frisbees, after all :P. Also, I couldn't grab anything, nor could I get my hand into small openings, nor hold a pencil, nor......ya know what, I couldn't even shoot myself for having frisbee hands if I did.
Would be basically impossible to walk, for a few weeks, with ski feet, but it IS the better alternative, where I live. I'd get places pretty quickly skiing down hill.
Since both suck, I would have to take the lesser of two evils, in ski feet, if I must choose.
Would be basically impossible to walk, for a few weeks, with ski feet, but it IS the better alternative, where I live. I'd get places pretty quickly skiing down hill.
Since both suck, I would have to take the lesser of two evils, in ski feet, if I must choose.
Jan 27, 2010 6:22 PM #541098
Skis for feet are manageable, because you can still do stuff, plus it'd make it cheaper to go on holiday. Frisbee hands would **** up your entire life for ever.
Jan 27, 2010 6:28 PM #541100
Well after long thinking about it I arrived to a similar conclusion to Bomb so my answer is the same
Jan 27, 2010 7:13 PM #541103
Why the **** would you want frisbees for hands? I can see advantages in skis for feet in alpine areas, but frisbees for hands bear no positive sides whatsoever.
Jan 28, 2010 6:49 AM #541287
Quote from ÜberschallWhy the **** would you want frisbees for hands? I can see advantages in skis for feet in alpine areas, but frisbees for hands bear no positive sides whatsoever.
Quote from Überschall[SIZE="5"]hands? I can see advantages in skis for feet in alpine areas, but frisbees for hands bear no positive [/SIZE]
Quote from Überschall[SIZE="6"]hands bear[/SIZE]
Quote from Überschall[SIZE="7"]bear hands[/SIZE]
theres your answer
Feb 22, 2010 10:10 PM #549878
i would say skis because if you were in like Vancover or Colorado you would probaly have it better than frisbees for hands. I say Skis for feet
Feb 22, 2010 11:11 PM #549890
Skis for feet. I could still get around with those, here.
Feb 22, 2010 11:43 PM #549892
What if it were skis for hands and frisbees for feet?
Feb 23, 2010 2:17 AM #549933
if it were FUNCTIONAL HELICOPTER BLADES for hands, then i'd go for that, but frisbees serve no use to me
Feb 23, 2010 2:19 AM #549935
i chose skies becuase in the winter it would be easy.
Feb 23, 2010 5:19 AM #549999
skis for feet, cant risk loosing the dexterity of your hands.
Feb 23, 2010 12:43 PM #550043
I couldent get used to frisbees for hands
Feb 26, 2010 7:03 AM #551116
Quote from Scarecrowif it were FUNCTIONAL HELICOPTER BLADES for hands, then i'd go for that, but frisbees serve no use to me
Lol'd hard