Zebra's are superior in that they are more efficient survivors. Zebra's rely on group tactics and trickery which get them out of any situation. Igloos just sit there as the bushfire engulfs them.

lmao well played zed

But no amount of trickery or group tactics would allow a zebra to survive in the artic.
Where bushfires are non-existant

Quote from Devour

But no amount of trickery or group tactics would allow a zebra to survive in the artic.
Where bushfires are non-existant

An excellent point sir, which just reinforces my ideas.

Quote from Devour

But no amount of trickery or group tactics would allow a zebra to survive in the artic.
Where bushfires are non-existant

Not much standing still will keep an igloo safe on the savannah.
Where blizzards are non-existant

I can keep going all day :)

Igloos can only really survive in the arctic, (North and South Poles), wheras Zebras can live all over. Not just in the savannah, in temperate regions too. So Zebras can live in about 75% of the world, taking into account the deserts, and arctic, where not many animals live. Which means Igloos at pretty outnumbered. But they're still pretty cool.

Igloos can exist ANYWHERE. Indoors. :Undercover:

Also Zed, Igloos can survive to be an eskimo's house for his/her entire life. But zebras get eaten by leapords and lions before they reach the age of 10, usually. :v
I can go all day also

Zebras are keeping fresh and up to date with the new genetic mutations and shit. Their brief lifespan and speedy reproduction means they can stay adapted to their environment. As a species they're in it for the long haul. Igloos just can't adapt so well to changes in their environment because they live too long and don't do enough ****ing.

That's true - Igloos don't have a life, therefore don't move and are stuck in one place all the time. They wouldn't last an hour in the savannah; the bush fires will burn them down, whereas Zebras can at least avoid them.

Quote from Zed

Zebras are keeping fresh and up to date with the new genetic mutations and shit. Their brief lifespan and speedy reproduction means they can stay adapted to their environment. As a species they're in it for the long haul. Igloos just can't adapt so well to changes in their environment because they live too long and don't do enough ****ing.

Luckily, igloos can be man made and can never go extinct because they can be built by humans or other intelligent species.

Quote from TurboT

That's true - Igloos don't have a life, therefore don't move and are stuck in one place all the time. They wouldn't last an hour in the savannah; the bush fires will burn them down, whereas Zebras can at least avoid them.

I already said. Zebras wouldn't last 30 minutes in the artic without freezing

also an igloo doesn't have to go through the genetic process of evolving or mutating, when it is destroyed it is just rebuilt more sturdier than before

Quote from Devour

Luckily, igloos can be man made and can never go extinct because they can be built by humans or other intelligent species.

I'm sure they could make a comeback if conditions returned to how they were before, but for the interim they would be pretty well extinct in the wild were global temperatures to rise enough.

you can't use your zebra to make an ice lolly.

"Zed is scared of lurkers, but wanted to add: barbeque"

(+1 postcount to zed)

Quote from Zed

I'm sure they could make a comeback if conditions returned to how they were before, but for the interim they would be pretty well extinct in the wild were global temperatures to rise enough.

At least it wouldnt take billions of years like it would for zebras.
Plus I think igloos can exist in space as well