Morality Question

Started by: DiPi | Replies: 73 | Views: 4,466

Zed
2

Posts: 11,572
Joined: Feb 2009
Rep: 10

View Profile
Jun 10, 2012 8:51 AM #673952
Quote from DiPi
I was reading a comic in which the hero must choose between destroy or not an alien's planet

-His friend tells him to do it, since they destroyed half of their world and killed billions of people
-His girlfriend tells him to not do it, since on that planet there are, in addition to soldiers, people who live normal lives and didn't take part in the killing, still considering them as underdeveloped civilization

So, who do you think is right?


If these are literally the only relevant facts then absolutely not. Like Zawmbee said, there is not a single theory of ethics which would condone it. I don't know how to elaborate on this without enumerating everything ever written on the subject and showing that it all points to option 2.

If there are other facts you're leaving out, like otherwise they'll attack us again or whatever, then that's different.
General Douchington
Banned

Posts: 3,669
Joined: Jul 2007
Rep: 10

View Profile
Jun 10, 2012 8:52 AM #673957
Quote from error
an eye for an eye makes the whole galaxy blind


In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is king.
Euge

Posts: 109
Joined: May 2012
Rep: 10

View Profile
Jun 10, 2012 9:49 AM #674001
If they have been able to kill billions of people it means they are a menace for mankind. To protect our race we have to destroy them all, even killing innocents, and prevent for future attacks.
zawmbee
2

Posts: 6,197
Joined: Jun 2007

View Profile
Jun 10, 2012 9:53 AM #674003
Quote from Euge
If they have been able to kill billions of people it means they are a menace for mankind. To protect our race we have to destroy them all, even killing innocents, and prevent for future attacks.

Says the Italian?

Oh my.
Euge

Posts: 109
Joined: May 2012
Rep: 10

View Profile
Jun 10, 2012 9:57 AM #674005
Quote from zawmbee
Says the Italian?

Oh my.


What do you mean?
Fusion
Banned

Posts: 4,445
Joined: Aug 2008
Rep: 10

View Profile
Jun 14, 2012 8:39 PM #677136
Quote from Euge
If they have been able to kill billions of people it means they are a menace for mankind. To protect our race we have to destroy them all, even killing innocents, and prevent for future attacks.

All these nigger thugs on the street have been raping white women and smoking crack cocaine, better eradicate all black Americans regardless of their actions or social status.
DiPi
2

Posts: 3,075
Joined: Feb 2012
Rep: 10

View Profile
Jun 14, 2012 10:08 PM #677171
Quote from zawmbee
Says the Italian?

Oh my.


You know, I'm Italian too
Can you please explain me your answer, mister?
Winter
2

Posts: 17
Joined: May 2012
Rep: 10

View Profile
Jun 14, 2012 11:19 PM #677215
Deff his gf

Subjecting himself to same moral decision the aliens made that wiped out half the heros planet, would only bring the hero to the same level as the aliens. Therefor the only reasonable option would to NOT destroy the planet.
Euge

Posts: 109
Joined: May 2012
Rep: 10

View Profile
Jun 15, 2012 12:09 AM #677252
Quote from Fusion
All these nigger thugs on the street have been raping white women and smoking crack cocaine, better eradicate all black Americans regardless of their actions or social status.


Niggers are men, aliens aren't.
2-D
2

Posts: 12,355
Joined: Sep 2006
Rep: 10

View Profile
Jun 15, 2012 12:21 AM #677258
Quote from Hobbes
On one hand he kills a whole bunch of people, and it has cool explosions and shit. BUT on the other hand he gets pussy, so what's the moral choice you ask? I think it's pretty obvious.


yeah, but if you disrespect the woman and do the alpha thing and kick everything's ass, you'll get her pussy anyways. bitches love disrepsect.
Quote from Zed
If these are literally the only relevant facts then absolutely not. Like Zawmbee said, there is not a single theory of ethics which would condone it. I don't know how to elaborate on this without enumerating everything ever written on the subject and showing that it all points to option 2.

If there are other facts you're leaving out, like otherwise they'll attack us again or whatever, then that's different.


considering he said it was from a comic, hes leaving out almost everything but the ending. like: why did they attack, and will they attack again (as you said)
Fusion
Banned

Posts: 4,445
Joined: Aug 2008
Rep: 10

View Profile
Jun 15, 2012 1:01 AM #677276
Quote from Euge
Niggers are men, aliens aren't.


The analogy still works- you're making a decision based on a blanket statement that we've already established *doesn't* apply to all the members of a group.
Zed
2

Posts: 11,572
Joined: Feb 2009
Rep: 10

View Profile
Jun 15, 2012 8:53 AM #677379
Quote from Euge
Niggers are men, aliens aren't.


There was a time when people would disagree with you. You're just being speciesist.
Chimero
2

Posts: 626
Joined: Jan 2012
Rep: 10

View Profile
Jun 15, 2012 11:17 AM #677414
Quote from Zero
Peace is the answer. . .


:|

To a really stupid question. Kill them!
Euge

Posts: 109
Joined: May 2012
Rep: 10

View Profile
Jun 15, 2012 2:17 PM #677594
Quote from Fusion
The analogy still works- you're making a decision based on a blanket statement that we've already established *doesn't* apply to all the members of a group.


It's probably cause of my english, but I don't understand this sentence. Could you explain better?
Fusion
Banned

Posts: 4,445
Joined: Aug 2008
Rep: 10

View Profile
Jun 15, 2012 3:56 PM #677745
You are saying that we should kill innocent aliens because they *could* kill people, which is the same as saying we should kill innocent black people because they *could* rape white women or smoke crack cocaine. Neither of these things are reasonable because you are deciding you should kill them based on a characteristic they don't have, which is almost like killing them for no reason.