Post: Is god evil?
User: Highly_Scented
Infraction: Insulted Other Member(s)
Points: 2

Administrative Note:

Don't insult other members.

Message to User:

You are doing this again and again, that's why you are getting an infraction again. Follow the debating rules.

Original Post:

Quote from carstraft

ya ok idiot or god is trying to kill everybody because its better for them to live in heaven which is a paradise but wat would an idiot like u kno

I know enough to punch u in the face faggot

I'd still give him an infraction for Spam. It's called the Debate Section, if you press Reply without any intention of debating the topic, you're spamming.


edit: oh, wait, this is the "Is god evil?" thread? Highly's been one of the most active people in that debate, why did he get an infraction for something that happened 2 weeks ago? Compared to what he's contributed to that thread overall, and the idiocy he was replying to, I'd be pissed if I were Highly..

This infraction has been reversed.

Reason:

Small insults are apparently not infraction worthy.

oh, haha, I did complain about this one after all. yeah, this was bullshit.

Yeah I guess you did, I didn't see that you had posted here.

EDIT: It still doesn't seem like you give much of a shit at any rate compared to what you were saying in the other thread.

"Small insults are apparently not infraction worthy"

I agree with this entirely. Unless Stone wants it to be otherwise, or it becomes a specific rule that we agree to enforce, I'd prefer to not make the members of this forum feel like if they slip up on the rules even a little bit, they'll get infracted immediately.

Quote from Jeff

EDIT: It still doesn't seem like you give much of a shit at any rate compared to what you were saying in the other thread.

..I was the only person who defended highly and you honestly think that means I didn't care enough? what the fuck do you want from me.

You didn't really defend highly. You said, "Man I'd be pissed if I were highly" and that was it, compared to the shit going on in the other thread, it doesn't seem like you even tried to draw attention to this. If Devour hadn't reversed the infraction already, where would have gone after agreeing with him? I want you to be consistent and not just jumping around when it's convenient.

Exilement's whole edit in that post is all towards saying that Highly shouldn't be infracted. I think it only seems like he "gave more of a shit" in Jutsu's infraction thread because you two started arguing, and he ended up explaining his side of things a lot more. I bet if someone contested him in this thread, he would have done the same thing. Not that I can speak for him or anything.