Stick Page Forums Archive

[3d] Rocket Launchers ftw

Started by: Dudeman | Replies: 16 | Views: 1,593

Dudeman
2

Posts: 2,206
Joined: Aug 2005
Rep: 10

View Profile
May 15, 2008 12:26 AM #135488
http://antiup.net/file/z8hxn5n11i1hdqg_rpgepg.swf

http://antiup.net/view/136/


I like the first one better. Comments and ideas for my next project please.
Vervanda

Posts: 2,112
Joined: May 2007
Rep: 10

View Profile
May 15, 2008 12:45 AM #135499
render them properlly
Dudeman
2

Posts: 2,206
Joined: Aug 2005
Rep: 10

View Profile
May 15, 2008 12:49 AM #135500
Quote from Audix
render them properlly


I'm slightly confused as to what you're talking about. I did experiment between the two. I used a vector swf for the first and a raster swf for the other. I can see the difference and I know I'm sticking to vector.

However, you used "them" indicating I did both incorrectly. Are you talking about the lighting?
Vervanda

Posts: 2,112
Joined: May 2007
Rep: 10

View Profile
May 15, 2008 12:52 AM #135503
the equatorial ex collateral submission is not in tuned with the paraboloid's reformer.
Dudeman
2

Posts: 2,206
Joined: Aug 2005
Rep: 10

View Profile
May 15, 2008 4:29 AM #135591
I’m pretty sure I checked the lateral and longitudinal configurations between the two planes of specular highlights. I think you misinterpreted the resolution difference as a given sign of a the common ravix raster/vector rendering ass rape.

Dudemans is not amused. I know the load times are a bitch, but please check them out people :3

Someone post please.
Jeremy
2

Posts: 3,220
Joined: Sep 2005
Rep: 10

View Profile
May 15, 2008 4:58 AM #135601
I don't like the first one because it looks like its made out of just one mold. I do like the second one though, nice colors.
Steyene

Posts: 2,060
Joined: Apr 2006
Rep: 10

View Profile
May 15, 2008 9:31 AM #135648
The first on looks a heap better >_>. I like the look of it, and is a lot more detailed.
Bonk
2

Posts: 2,778
Joined: Mar 2008
Rep: 10

View Profile
May 15, 2008 9:43 AM #135650
The second one looks less futuristic, and it has a better feel to it. It looks more realistic in the sense that you could see someone using it more clearly.

I didn't like the first one, it looks too much like a robotic arm of sorts.
the_hero

Posts: 211
Joined: May 2008
Rep: 10

View Profile
May 15, 2008 11:01 AM #135657
The first one looks epic. If it had colour, to pinpoint which part is which, it would be even more epic.
Mantha
2

Posts: 8,267
Joined: Sep 2005
Rep: 10

View Profile
May 15, 2008 1:02 PM #135672
Omg, lethal weaponz.

I liek the first one very much. Can you insert the harpoons into the launcher? That combined with a headshot will be awesome.

Hrm, ideas ... maybe ... uh ... a battleship with all the details could keep you busy for a while. <.<
Sawc
2

Posts: 908
Joined: Oct 2006
Rep: 10

View Profile
May 15, 2008 11:34 PM #135959
Nice, I like the first one best.
Nukem
2

Posts: 1,333
Joined: Apr 2008
Rep: 10

View Profile
May 24, 2008 3:52 AM #140558
Holy cow. I about shat my pants!

The first one looked like a russian made RPG-7 fused together with an m16 with a touch of devilishness. It was epic (only if there was color...)

The second looked like a regular law-72 rocket launcher. But it still looked cool.
Dragon⁰⁷⁷
2

Posts: 2,165
Joined: Sep 2005
Rep: 10

View Profile
May 24, 2008 3:56 AM #140559
Where's the harpoon launcher?
MiniMan
2

Posts: 11,846
Joined: Dec 2005
Rep: 10

View Profile
May 24, 2008 6:07 AM #140637
Reminds me of the TF2 rocket launcher.
azam_me91
2

Posts: 742
Joined: Aug 2005
Rep: 10

View Profile
May 24, 2008 6:11 AM #140639
First one is much better. Add the coloring, of course.
Second one look like a telescope...no offense
Website Version: 1.0.4
© 2025 Max Games. All rights reserved.