thank you, pirate!

smb didn't have the best graphics, yet its the best selling game of all friggin time...

and have you SEEN the water and fur simulation on the wii?!

and, i have played the ps3 all day and night once, along with a few other times.

and, for a point:

Quote from zymn

thank you, pirate!

smb didn't have the best graphics, yet its the best selling game of all friggin time...

and have you SEEN the water and fur simulation on the wii?!

and, i have played the ps3 all day and night once, along with a few other times.

Super Mario Bros had awesome graphics for its time period.

not true. there were better. like this mech game.

and, read this article.

http://www.slate.com/id/2154158/nav/tap1/

Quote from zymn

thank you, pirate!

smb didn't have the best graphics, yet its the best selling game of all friggin time...

and have you SEEN the water and fur simulation on the wii?!

and, i have played the ps3 all day and night once, along with a few other times.

and, for a point:

Are you even aware about how many copies GTA 4, Halo 3, and CoD4 have sold?
SSBB hasn't come close to the amount sold for any of those games.

OMG, NOOB!

SUPER MARIO BROS!
my god, you have no sense of the past.

another article.
http://www.gamesfirst.com/?id=1483

Quote from zymn

OMG, NOOB!

SUPER MARIO BROS!
my god, you have no sense of the past.

another article.
http://www.gamesfirst.com/?id=1483

Why the **** are you digging up articles made in the first month of release for the ****ing consoles?
In Posted Monday, Nov. 20, 2006, at 5:39 PM ET for your wii article, that was made also by a website I have never seen or even heard of before until now.
And that was in the first few weeks of the Wii, when the novelty was there, its been 2 years, and the novelty has worn off.
Also, for your ps3 article date posted: 11:31 AM Thu Dec 14th, 2006 was in the first 2 months of the ps3's life, when the backwards compatibility wasn't too great, its fixed now.
Honestly don't talk about shit you have no clue about.
And I bet you anything, you just searched this shit on google and didn't even read the articles, you just looked at the title.
EDIT: And about the SMB, that game had good graphics for its time, though, it isn't the top selling game of all time.

no, i read it. and looked at the images.

and u have no comment about thinking that smb is ssbb?

Quote from zymn

no, i read it. and looked at the images.

and u have no comment about thinking that smb is ssbb?

The acronym looked similar, so I mistook it as SSBB.

Graphics comparison
360:

PS3:

Wii:


Obviously The 360 and PS3 have better and more realistic graphics. Graphics aren't that big of an issue for me, normally. But in todays day and age, the Wii's graphics are lacking. If I want a "future proof" console, I'll go for the PS3 or the 360.

I'll admit that this debate has made me rethink my choice for favorite console. I'm torn between PS3 and the 360. If I went out today and bought a new console though, I'd have to get the 360, because I don't like to play the waiting game. But since I won't be getting a new console anytime soon, by the time I end up getting one, the PS3 should be in a more adamant position for my choice for favorite console.


Current Line up for my favorite new gen consoles;
360
PS3
Wii

Quote from Apples

Yeah, which needs a graphics card the price of 2 PS3's plus, to have the same graphics.
*COUGH*
Crysis
*COUGH*

At least the PC can actually run Crysis.

Rather Cheezy, that 360 game is Gears of War, no?

Quote from Guest.

At least the PC can actually run Crysis.

At least consoles can just be put into the disc slot without having to install, and run programs in the background while running the game.
And without having to purchase a new graphics card every year to be up to date with the games.

Quote from Apples

At least consoles can just be put into the disc slot without having to install, and run programs in the background while running the game.
Really? You can't think of any better arguments than that? Wait, it's not even an argument!
And without having to purchase a new graphics card every year to be up to date with the games.
It's true. It sucks, but it's true. Although I would rather spend $200 every 4 years for better looking games than $600 every 6 years for a new Sony console.

Bold .

Quote from Guest.

Bold .

600 dollars?
Its not 600 dollars anymore, why do people keep thinking that?

Quote from Apples

600 dollars?
Its not 600 dollars anymore, why do people keep thinking that?

Was it when it came out? Yes, yes it was.

Quote from Guest.

Was it when it came out? Yes, yes it was.

It isn't now, so why don't people just stop saying it is?