Should it be allowed? In every country other than Iran, Zimbabwe and the US the death penalty is outlawed. Should the US follow suit? I know that a large portion of this forum is from the US, so at least one of you has to have a different opinion than the rest of civilization.
DISCUSS
Death Penalty
Started by: Dinomut | Replies: 28 | Views: 2,075
Jun 24, 2008 3:27 PM #165543
Jun 24, 2008 3:29 PM #165546
If a serial killer killed 10 people. I think you are allowed to shoot the crap out of him. His fault.
Jun 24, 2008 4:40 PM #165633
The US is ****ed up, period, so even if we want them too, they're still gonna be killing innocent people accidentally.
Jun 24, 2008 5:18 PM #165685
An eye for an eye, A tooth for a tooth.
It worked in the Dark Ages, and it sure would work now.
(This won't count for self-defense offcourse)
It worked in the Dark Ages, and it sure would work now.
(This won't count for self-defense offcourse)
Jun 24, 2008 5:24 PM #165700
Quote from TrypheonAn eye for an eye, A tooth for a tooth.
It worked in the Dark Ages, and it sure would work now.
(This won't count for self-defense offcourse)
How did it work in the dark ages? It created the world wars yunno.
Jun 24, 2008 5:27 PM #165706
I'd say it was okay if our police system was perfect. But as mod said it isn't. That kind of punishment is way too permanent.
Jun 24, 2008 5:28 PM #165708
Quote from TrypheonAn eye for an eye, A tooth for a tooth.
It worked in the Dark Ages, and it sure would work now.
(This won't count for self-defense offcourse)
What the hell does self-defense have to do with anything here?
The problem about the death penalty is that it's... fatal. If you screw up and kill someone innocent, oh boy. I don't see anything wrong with the judgement of killing somebody who has killed somebody else out of reasons such as greediness is sure worth death penalty in my eyes. It's erasing a life just for the sake of one's own luxury and something where I don't see anything wrong with the death penalty. And of course, shit like genocide or massive mass-murder (Hussein, for example) is something that well deserves such a penalty in my eyes.
However, it's too insecure because a made mistake can't be revised with letting someone go and paying him some money to get his life going again, which is why I am against the death penalty afterall.
Jun 24, 2008 5:32 PM #165712
They should bring back the Death Penalty when they invent 100% reliable Lie Detectors or a mind-reading judge when being trialled.
Jun 24, 2008 5:33 PM #165714
Quote from ÜberschallWhat the hell does self-defense have to do with anything here?
If you kill someone because he stabs you with a knife, would you deserve to get death penalty?
Quote from LUXIIt created the world wars
Since when did world wars take place in the Dark Ages?
Jun 24, 2008 5:34 PM #165720
Quote from TrypheonIf you kill someone because he stabs you with a knife, would you deserve to get death penalty?
No, you wouldn't get any ****ing penalty.
Jun 24, 2008 5:52 PM #165756
Quote from LixuHow did it work in the dark ages? It created the world wars yunno.
How did the death penalty create the World Wars?
Jun 24, 2008 5:56 PM #165766
Germany wanted a third Reich for a while, so they appointed someone to fulfill these needs and Hitler did as such, thats the cause of world war 2.
I have no ****ing idea about world war one, but probably the same.
I have no ****ing idea about world war one, but probably the same.
Jun 24, 2008 6:16 PM #165798
Quote from ÜberschallHow did the death penalty create the World Wars?
That killing scythe was overused, people got angry. They got into protest. Leading to more problems, leading to the first world war.
Jun 24, 2008 6:26 PM #165819
Quote from MoDGermany wanted a third Reich for a while, so they appointed someone to fulfill these needs and Hitler did as such, thats the cause of world war 2.
I have no ****ing idea about world war one, but probably the same.
Germany had the third Reich as Hitler came to leadership. That's what began the third Reich. And how does that, in any way, relate to the War? Also, WWI was completely different.
Quote from LixuThat killing scythe was overused, people got angry. They got into protest. Leading to more problems, leading to the first world war.
Killing wasn't overused. It was used less than ever before in history. People protested against political situations and not the death penalty.
Jun 24, 2008 6:37 PM #165847
Quote from Überschall
Killing wasn't overused. It was used less than ever before in history. People protested against political situations and not the death penalty.
It was, i have a book in front of me.