Out Of Sync Analysis

Started by: brockemon | Replies: 42 | Views: 4,587

jli

Posts: 988
Joined: Jan 2013
Rep: 10

View Profile
Jul 17, 2013 11:11 PM #1038544
Brock, if I may offer a suggestion, perhaps you should implement some sort of heuristic to detect whether or not one player is winning or losing, then use that to look for suspicious OOS'es instead of relying solely on OOS frequency (due to the issue mentioned above).
Maxchiang .
Banned

Posts: 328
Joined: May 2013
Rep: 10

View Profile
Jul 17, 2013 11:54 PM #1038569
Quote from isgood
i think some people who had done many many matches but have exploited at least 20 times won't be shown because it is 20%


Lets lower it down to 1%, or 0.1% then.
Nyarlathotep

Posts: 2,240
Joined: Jan 2013
Rep: 10

View Profile
Jul 18, 2013 1:12 AM #1038614
Quote from jerrytt
I dont think either of those accounts had over 20% OOS errors. (which is a bit high IMO)


I think you're a bit confused here. The 20% is that the list was only 20% of the names.
WyzDM
2

Posts: 2,265
Joined: Jan 2013
Rep: 10

View Profile
Jul 18, 2013 4:06 AM #1038700
Quote from IHATETHISNAME
I think you're a bit confused here. The 20% is that the list was only 20% of the names.


This makes more sense, and if the point is the ability to recognize a few names from the list, then wham-o: mission accomplished.
BuddyLucky2
2

Posts: 431
Joined: Nov 2012
Rep: 10

View Profile
Jul 18, 2013 4:21 AM #1038709
Well holy syncin' sh*t, There was a lot less out of syncs back in my old beta days :p

Rating derives the evil competition out of people now-a-days, No wonder why I retired lol
ShadowGeneralChaos
2

Posts: 2,141
Joined: Mar 2013
Rep: 10

View Profile
Jul 18, 2013 8:24 AM #1038792
@ brockemon WOW, nice work man.... But I think there is a mistake: You wrote "dragon89" .... didnt you mean "dragon88"?
jerrytt
2

Posts: 1,258
Joined: Oct 2012
Rep: 10

View Profile
Jul 18, 2013 7:23 PM #1039240
Quote from IHATETHISNAME
I think you're a bit confused here. The 20% is that the list was only 20% of the names.


... and why is it that the ratio of OOS to games(on very the right) ended at exactly 20.0?
xanderman222222
Banned

Posts: 302
Joined: Mar 2013
Rep: 10

View Profile
Jul 18, 2013 7:43 PM #1039257
Quote from ShadowGeneralChaos
@ brockemon WOW, nice work man.... But I think there is a mistake: You wrote "dragon89" .... didnt you mean "dragon88"?


Maybe its an alt of dragon88,or vice-versa
Nyarlathotep

Posts: 2,240
Joined: Jan 2013
Rep: 10

View Profile
Jul 18, 2013 8:27 PM #1039295
Quote from jerrytt
... and why is it that the ratio of OOS to games(on very the right) ended at exactly 20.0?


ah okay. I guess I was wrong.
WyzDM
2

Posts: 2,265
Joined: Jan 2013
Rep: 10

View Profile
Jul 19, 2013 7:22 AM #1039855
Quote from BuddyLucky2
Well holy syncin' sh*t, There was a lot less out of syncs back in my old beta days :p

Rating derives the evil competition out of people now-a-days, No wonder why I retired lol


There were fewer players back then too. I was still OOS'd though.
taylork2

Posts: 20
Joined: Feb 2013
Rep: 10

View Profile
Jul 19, 2013 8:54 PM #1040335
I want dragon89 banned, I was kickin his a$$ until he went out of sync twice in a row. And bragged about it during the match before he did it.
BuddyLucky2
2

Posts: 431
Joined: Nov 2012
Rep: 10

View Profile
Jul 20, 2013 12:29 AM #1040424
Man, SE would be a Better, Friendlier and Cheat-less game if everyone just tried...


If you won and feel the need to brag like most people do, doing this^ instead and letting the losing player lose without any "Shit talk" would help
If you lose, just don't look at your imaginary rating # and try^, and just enjoy the game without raging
In general if everyone just enjoyed the game and didn't give a f*** about losing, winning or rating then it would be a better gaming environment for everyone

Seriously just enjoy the game and don't let that imaginary number tell you how skilled you are!

P.S. Now just enjoy that JOKE(Not to be taken seriously) video too :p
THEFORCE
2

Posts: 1,391
Joined: Feb 2013
Rep: 10

View Profile
Jul 21, 2013 6:27 PM #1042209
Quote from ShadowGeneralChaos
@ brockemon WOW, nice work man.... But I think there is a mistake: You wrote "dragon89" .... didnt you mean "dragon88"?


I know Dragon89. He's one of my old friends. He retired a long time ago in beta. Dragon88 is that new exploiter.
WyzDM
2

Posts: 2,265
Joined: Jan 2013
Rep: 10

View Profile
Jul 22, 2013 9:25 AM #1042742
Quote from THEFORCE
I know Dragon89. He's one of my old friends. He retired a long time ago in beta. Dragon88 is that new exploiter.


I've seen dragon89. I have reason to believe they're one and the same.
SpikeyTaco
2

Posts: 5
Joined: Jul 2013
Rep: 10

View Profile
Jul 25, 2013 4:11 PM #1046055
kingofhacker, WOW. I never thought he could of been a hacker....