Well, I got an e-mail saying simsim marked my user page for deletion, which appears to be making me blocked on the wiki, atleast that's what my user page says.
If someone could get in touch with the RealJuiceBox and get him to un-admin simsim, that would be great, obviously he's stuck-up and mad that I reversed a lot of his shitty "contributions". Apparently, I've been blocked for marking too many pages for deletion, even though a lot of them were unnecesarry and were deleted already.
Tentative Issue: Quality of SE Wiki and SE Forums (Information)
Started by: Dazzy | Replies: 80 | Views: 6,818
Jan 13, 2014 9:08 PM #1140897
Jan 13, 2014 9:13 PM #1140899
Quote from FailingAtFailingWell, I got an e-mail saying simsim marked my user page for deletion, which appears to be making me blocked on the wiki, atleast that's what my user page says.
If someone could get in touch with the RealJuiceBox and get him to un-admin simsim, that would be great, obviously he's stuck-up and mad that I reversed a lot of his shitty "contributions". Apparently, I've been blocked for marking too many pages for deletion, even though a lot of them were unnecesarry and were deleted already.
Doesn't matter, we're gonna make a new wiki. You online right now?
Jan 13, 2014 9:18 PM #1140901
Quote from DragonArcherZDoesn't matter, we're gonna make a new wiki. You online right now?
Yea, I posted 5 minutes before you, lol
So where is this new wiki anyway? We could probably take stuff from the old wiki, technically not plagiarism because we're pretty well the same people who made the last wiki.
Jan 13, 2014 9:20 PM #1140902
Quote from FailingAtFailingYea, I posted 5 minutes before you, lol
So where is this new wiki anyway? We could probably take stuff from the old wiki, technically not plagiarism because we're pretty well the same people who made the last wiki.
Haven't made it yet; been going around the clan chats yesterday to see if they were all okay for it.
EDIT: I'll make it right now.
Jan 13, 2014 9:25 PM #1140903
Quote from DragonArcherZHaven't made it yet; been going around the clan chats yesterday to see if they were all okay for it.
EDIT: I'll make it right now.
Cool, you should probably edit the new link into the top of the original post of this topic.
Jan 13, 2014 9:27 PM #1140904
Quote from FailingAtFailingCool, you should probably edit the new link into the top of the original post of this topic.
New link is going to be stickempires-rts.wikia.com
EDIT: http://stickempires-rts.wikia.com/wiki/Stick_Empires_Wiki
Using a default theme right now; I'll get around to finding someone to make graphics/getting some good graphics.
I gotta dash in about 10 mins, will come back and work on this.
Jan 13, 2014 9:29 PM #1140907
Quote from DragonArcherZNew link is going to be stickempires-rts.wikia.com
Just to be clear, are we including stuff about Stick War 1 and Stick War 2?
Jan 13, 2014 9:33 PM #1140908
Quote from FailingAtFailingJust to be clear, are we including stuff about Stick War 1 and Stick War 2?
No; otherwise it'd be Inamorta.wikia.com :P
Well, the reason why I think this is because SW2 is kind of outdated; e.g. Sword = 150, Archer = 350 and it gets messy to include things about it; along with SW1. There'd be a lack of any solid information and we are a Stick Empires community.
Jan 13, 2014 9:48 PM #1140909
Quote from DragonArcherZNo; otherwise it'd be Inamorta.wikia.com :P
Well, the reason why I think this is because SW2 is kind of outdated; e.g. Sword = 150, Archer = 350 and it gets messy to include things about it; along with SW1. There'd be a lack of any solid information and we are a Stick Empires community.
Ah, because we could've had the information split, like a unit could have info regarding it in Stick War 1 in one section and Stick Empires in another section. It'd be clearly defined, but I was just asking because the name leaned a lot on Stick Empires only.
EDIT: I made mention of the old wiki on the new wiki, if that's okay. Just for legacy's sake and so people don't get them confused. I'm making some new pages right now, but I directly took the old Metagame Strategy page from the old wiki and put it here.
EDIT 2: Is it alright if I use Canadian English?
Jan 14, 2014 12:10 AM #1140942
As long as it's readable, sure.
Also, I'll be editting the Metagame strategy page so it's less biased and more generic.
Also, I'll be editting the Metagame strategy page so it's less biased and more generic.
Jan 14, 2014 12:32 AM #1140951
Quote from DragonArcherZAs long as it's readable, sure.
Also, I'll be editting the Metagame strategy page so it's less biased and more generic.
Alright, no objections to that.
Jan 14, 2014 1:57 AM #1140981
Chucked in Chat & Forums. Forums, because yeah, chat for communication. Will be editting your pages Failing just to clean up any mistakes and so on.
Jan 14, 2014 2:12 AM #1140987
Quote from DragonArcherZChucked in Chat & Forums. Forums, because yeah, chat for communication. Will be editting your pages Failing just to clean up any mistakes and so on.
Yea, I forget Deads had Armour, lol. Thanks for editing that.
Jan 14, 2014 8:09 AM #1141097
lol really
Deads have armor ? failingatFailing ?
Deads have armor ? failingatFailing ?
Jan 14, 2014 8:20 AM #1141101
Yes it does. If an arrow hits a dead, you'd hear a 'thunk' sound. That's the sign of armor.