k so I was in the shower but I wasn't fapping, so I decided to think.
I know, holy shit.:Spiderman:
I thought, "Hey, we are all multi-celled organisms, so one time maybe there must have only been single celled organisms".
So then I'm thinking about porn and killing babies and french vanilla.
And then I think "Maybe these single celled organisms wanted to survive, so they bound together to make living systems in order to prevail".
So maybe we are all just giant robot systems created by single celled organisms to kick ass to other single celled organisms. :Cool: Like giant robots built to live and obliterate the rest. "Survival of the fittest".
Commence proving me wrong, because I know I am somehow.
A funny little theory I thought up.
Started by: CriticalDesign | Replies: 8 | Views: 967
Jul 9, 2008 5:42 AM #181519
Jul 9, 2008 5:45 AM #181524
hmm...
It does seem logical I suppose...
It does seem logical I suppose...
Jul 9, 2008 5:45 AM #181525
Er...
You actually hit the nail on the head.
The idea of living things being anything special is a complete fallacy. Every function of our body can be attributed to evolution, DNA, and cell theory.
First a few single celled organisms hung around, then they began to depend on each other, then they attatched and did simple tasks, then they continued to build up, and eventually we had jellyfish-like organisms, then we had simple fish-like things, then fish, then amphibians, then reptiles, then birds and mammals, and the rest is history.
You actually hit the nail on the head.
The idea of living things being anything special is a complete fallacy. Every function of our body can be attributed to evolution, DNA, and cell theory.
First a few single celled organisms hung around, then they began to depend on each other, then they attatched and did simple tasks, then they continued to build up, and eventually we had jellyfish-like organisms, then we had simple fish-like things, then fish, then amphibians, then reptiles, then birds and mammals, and the rest is history.
Jul 9, 2008 5:54 AM #181536
Quote from adrenalineflashwords
Yeah, that's the way I learnt it.
Jul 9, 2008 12:27 PM #181787
...
Am I the only one here that's heard of the book The Selfish Gene?
You're over 30 years too late with your theory.
The book even uses the word robots in that sense.
Am I the only one here that's heard of the book The Selfish Gene?
You're over 30 years too late with your theory.
The book even uses the word robots in that sense.
Jul 9, 2008 2:51 PM #181846
I'm not claiming that I was the first to come up with this theory, I was just wondering how many people agreed. Plus it would be an awesome movie.
Jul 9, 2008 3:36 PM #181856
Quote from smxqrth...
Am I the only one here that's heard of the book The Selfish Gene?
You're over 30 years too late with your theory.
The book even uses the word robots in that sense.
No, I'm an avid Dawkins reader. The God Delusion is one of my favorite books.
Jul 9, 2008 3:54 PM #181869
The Dawkins Delusion is one of my favorite books. and yeah, i believe in this theory, but somehow i dont believe it fully. maybe it is true to a certain extent.
Jul 9, 2008 6:07 PM #181962
Quote from jrockpunk1The Dawkins Delusion is one of my favorite books. and yeah, i believe in this theory, but somehow i dont believe it fully. maybe it is true to a certain extent.
That book was complete shit, though. Many of the refutations are based on arguments that depend on others that have already been refuted, and his attitude is highly arrogant: he doesn't think, he KNOWS. Where The God Delusion is a work of science that claims no absolutes, McGrath states what he says are absolute truths.