The Internet Fastlane and Net Neutrality

Started by: Gunnii | Replies: 4 | Views: 466

Gunnii
2

Posts: 896
Joined: Mar 2012
Rep: 10

View Profile
May 7, 2014 6:33 PM #1193075
"Incorrect information, thanks Exilement" (Click to Show)


Quote from Exilement
This is completely misleading. The FCC is holding an Open Commission Meeting on that date to discuss net neutrality along with a few other topics, it is not a planned date to pass any regulations.


This situation sounds very scary to me, it would give the ISP's nearly full control over the largest portion of the internet. It would stifle innovation, block freedom of speech and the only once that would gain on this would be the corporate CEOs.
This is something that we all should concern ourselves with, even if we are not American, the effects of these laws will be felt internationally.

Quote from Exilement
So what can you do?

White House petition to preserve net neutrality

Petition to reclsasify broadband providers as common carriers

Link to all of the FCC leaders and their e-mail addresses. You can also contact openinternet@fcc.gov

Sample e-mail (Click to Show)


If you want a more personal outlet for your concerns, here's Tom Wheeler's office's phone number: 1-202-418-1000

Get to it, guys.
Exile
Administrator
2

Posts: 8,404
Joined: Dec 2005
Rep: 10

View Profile
May 7, 2014 9:26 PM #1193099
oh boy.

Quote from Gunnii
The FCC will possibly be passing a law on May 15th that will cause ISP's to be classified as an information service rather then a telecommunication service


This is completely misleading. The FCC is holding an Open Commission Meeting on that date to discuss net neutrality along with a few other topics, it is not a planned date to pass any regulations.

More pertinently, ISPs and broadband providers were classified as information services back in the early 2000's. I don't know where you got your summary from, but it's not the issue at hand. Here's an extremely brief summary of what's actually going on:

Chairman Tom Wheeler circulated the proposal among his fellow commissioners on Thursday. The actual text of the plan is not yet public, but the agency has said it would let Internet service providers give preferential treatment to some content providers on “commercially reasonable” terms. Watchdog groups say that could force consumers to pay more and squeeze out startups that can’t afford anything but the slow lane.

The FCC’s former rules on the issue were struck down by a federal appeals court in January. Now Wheeler is pushing to get the new regulations on the books by the end of this year. Wheeler has circulated the proposals among his fellow commissioners, who are set to address them at a regular agency meeting on May 15.

In a blog post on Thursday, Wheeler denied reports that his plans would abandon the FCC’s commitment to an open Internet. But numerous advocacy groups don’t buy it. Campaigns are already calling for consumers to protest the plans to the White House and lawmakers.


So what can you do?

White House petition to preserve net neutrality

Petition to reclsasify broadband providers as common carriers

Link to all of the FCC leaders and their e-mail addresses. You can also contact openinternet@fcc.gov

Sample e-mail (Click to Show)


If you want a more personal outlet for your concerns, here's Tom Wheeler's office's phone number: 1-202-418-1000

Get to it, guys.
Zed
2

Posts: 11,572
Joined: Feb 2009
Rep: 10

View Profile
May 7, 2014 9:59 PM #1193104
I'm not sure what the issue is here. You'll get faster internet if you pay more? Isn't that already the situation?




Edit: I have now watched the video so I understand a bit more. Seems fine in principle, but if the US has an issue with ISP monopolies then there will be a problem. In fact, there probably will have been a problem for a very long time. The girl talks about "a $100/month for 10mb on a good day", which is appalling. Don't protest this net neutrality thing - protest the unregulated monopolies.
Gunnii
2

Posts: 896
Joined: Mar 2012
Rep: 10

View Profile
May 7, 2014 9:59 PM #1193105
Quote from Exilement
oh boy.



This is completely misleading. The FCC is holding an Open Commission Meeting on that date to discuss net neutrality along with a few other topics, it is not a planned date to pass any regulations.

More pertinently, ISPs and broadband providers were classified as information services back in the early 2000's. I don't know where you got your summary from, but it's not the issue at hand. Here's an extremely brief summary of what's actually going on:



So what can you do?

White House petition to preserve net neutrality

Petition to reclsasify broadband providers as common carriers

Link to all of the FCC leaders and their e-mail addresses. You can also contact openinternet@fcc.gov

Sample e-mail (Click to Show)


If you want a more personal outlet for your concerns, here's Tom Wheeler's office's phone number: 1-202-418-1000

Get to it, guys.


Thanks for the clarifying, I haven't really done much research into this other then seeing some brief summaries on Youtube. This issue isn't exactly making headlines where I live. I'll fix my mistakes in the OP :p

Quote from Zed
I'm not sure what the issue is here. You'll get faster internet if you pay more? Isn't that already the situation?


I believe that people are worried that rather then charging more for extra speed they will start charging people for keeping up the current speeds. What is also unsettling is the lack of competition in the American ISP market and the ISP's relation to other forms of communications and media.
Exile
Administrator
2

Posts: 8,404
Joined: Dec 2005
Rep: 10

View Profile
May 7, 2014 11:06 PM #1193122
Quote from Zed
I'm not sure what the issue is here. You'll get faster internet if you pay more? Isn't that already the situation?


The situation is that all of the infrastructure for the internet in the US is controlled by a small number of ISPs who usually act as the region's sole provider for cable TV, internet and phone lines.

Content providers like Netflix and Hulu are in direct competition with the companies that own and control the lines those services are delivered through. Thank to Netflix, I have no reason to buy cable TV ever again, and it's a direct loss to the company providing me the means to access Netflix in the first place. There's a real concern that ISPs might throttle traffic to specific sites like those unless their customers pay extra fees, which they have every economic incentive to do as it is. If the FCC allows it to happen, there's no possible way consumers will benefit from it.