Stick Page Forums Archive

XBWAWKZ OR PEE ESS THWWEE (Xbox Or PS3)

Started by: Zewlu | Replies: 55 | Views: 1,931

Ash
2

Posts: 5,269
Joined: Nov 2005
Rep: 10

View Profile
Jul 19, 2008 5:34 AM #192419
Quote from Apples
Notice how the list has better games which appeal to me.


okay then, you agree that the PS3 isn't better overall, jsut that it's better for your interests.

okay, then, that's good and I respect that, just don't in the next breath try to say that it's in any other way a better console than the 360, because, as always, it goes to personal oppinion and interest what games you'd like.

To explain my point, I'll use an example.

On person may say that hte Wii is a better console than the 360.

He may agree that it is less powerful and that the online play is shit.

He may just like the kind of games it has; games like Warioware and Endless Ocean, Mario Galaxies and Boogie. Simple fur fun games. (Well, boogie doesn't fall under the latter category)

However, that doesn't make the Wii a BAD or GOOD console, just desireable for him.

What makes a console good or bad isn't whether YOU like it's games (Frankly, Gears wasn't one of the best game I've played, and I disliked Crackdown, Dead of Alive 4, or Ninja Gaiden 2.), nor is it about how many games it has.

It's not even about how powerful it is. (Though that helps a whole lot.)

Whether a console is good or bad is determined by how open it is to development, how it is supported, what features it has, and above all, the quality of it's design.

Remember that the PS2 was actually weaker than the Gamecube and the Xbox. It did a great job in the console war because it had great tools for developers, suppoted DVDs, and above all had a solid archetecture.

The fact of the matter is that the PS3, while it is certainly the most powerful console available, it just doesn't have the implementation, archetecture, and design required to be developer friendly, so the quality of game created for it suffer for that reason.

It is just too hard to develop games for it. The tools Sony provides for developers just aren't as effective as those the 360 and Wii have, and so dealing with the multi-core proccessing just isn't as easy as it should be.

Look at the PS3 version of the orange box. It had a longer development cycle (A whole 3 months, despite the close release dates) and yet it still suffered from framerate issues because the tools weren't well made, so making the change from single-core to multi-core archetecture was difficult.
Jeremy
2

Posts: 3,220
Joined: Sep 2005
Rep: 10

View Profile
Jul 19, 2008 11:11 AM #192564
^^TL;DR It only matters what console you like, but the ps3 still sucks.

=/

Oh hey guys, my brother just bought a ps3, no joke. I'm as happy as a clam.

"So, jeremy. What games should we go get for it?"
"Umm, uh. Metal gear solid 4 is out. Get that. And then theres....eh, well hold on...um."

Thats the actual conversation 4srs.
2-D
2

Posts: 12,355
Joined: Sep 2006
Rep: 10

View Profile
Jul 19, 2008 11:20 AM #192574
Quote from Jeremy

"So, jeremy. What games should we go get for it?"
"Umm, uh. Metal gear solid 4 is out. Get that. And then theres....eh, well hold on...um."


wow, how about that? after all that defending the sacred ps3, you finally find out that it has NO GAMES

enjoy your movie, faggot
Jeremy
2

Posts: 3,220
Joined: Sep 2005
Rep: 10

View Profile
Jul 19, 2008 11:24 AM #192579
Well I'm playing oblivion on it and thats pretty cool. I could also get drakes fortune, and my brother wants to get the original resistance online. There is also warhawk and heavenly sword to get, motorstorm as well...

I was trying to be humorous faggot, why so serious?
2-D
2

Posts: 12,355
Joined: Sep 2006
Rep: 10

View Profile
Jul 19, 2008 11:41 AM #192604
imo.

better console = better games
shitty console = no games
no games = ps3
Jeremy
2

Posts: 3,220
Joined: Sep 2005
Rep: 10

View Profile
Jul 19, 2008 11:42 AM #192605
No games that you like....
2-D
2

Posts: 12,355
Joined: Sep 2006
Rep: 10

View Profile
Jul 19, 2008 11:56 AM #192615
so what games are on the ps3 that you would buy

note that i said games, not movies
Jeremy
2

Posts: 3,220
Joined: Sep 2005
Rep: 10

View Profile
Jul 19, 2008 12:39 PM #192637
I just fucking listed them. Did you not read my post?
Apples
2

Posts: 1,931
Joined: Dec 2005
Rep: 10

View Profile
Jul 20, 2008 4:10 AM #193156
Quote from 2-D
so what games are on the ps3 that you would buy

note that i said games, not movies


Oh god, that joke is getting old really fast.
<_<
Liquid_Tang

Posts: 0
Joined: Jul 2025
Jul 20, 2008 5:20 AM #193205
I just looked into the hole and there he was covered in some sort of porous material.
Garuda
2

Posts: 2,123
Joined: Sep 2007
Rep: 10

View Profile
Jul 20, 2008 10:42 PM #193708
Quote from Ash
okay then, you agree that the PS3 isn't better overall, jsut that it's better for your interests.

okay, then, that's good and I respect that, just don't in the next breath try to say that it's in any other way a better console than the 360, because, as always, it goes to personal oppinion and interest what games you'd like.

To explain my point, I'll use an example.

On person may say that hte Wii is a better console than the 360.

He may agree that it is less powerful and that the online play is shit.

He may just like the kind of games it has; games like Warioware and Endless Ocean, Mario Galaxies and Boogie. Simple fur fun games. (Well, boogie doesn't fall under the latter category)

However, that doesn't make the Wii a BAD or GOOD console, just desireable for him.

What makes a console good or bad isn't whether YOU like it's games (Frankly, Gears wasn't one of the best game I've played, and I disliked Crackdown, Dead of Alive 4, or Ninja Gaiden 2.), nor is it about how many games it has.

It's not even about how powerful it is. (Though that helps a whole lot.)

Whether a console is good or bad is determined by how open it is to development, how it is supported, what features it has, and above all, the quality of it's design.

Remember that the PS2 was actually weaker than the Gamecube and the Xbox. It did a great job in the console war because it had great tools for developers, suppoted DVDs, and above all had a solid archetecture.

The fact of the matter is that the PS3, while it is certainly the most powerful console available, it just doesn't have the implementation, archetecture, and design required to be developer friendly, so the quality of game created for it suffer for that reason.

It is just too hard to develop games for it. The tools Sony provides for developers just aren't as effective as those the 360 and Wii have, and so dealing with the multi-core proccessing just isn't as easy as it should be.

Look at the PS3 version of the orange box. It had a longer development cycle (A whole 3 months, despite the close release dates) and yet it still suffered from framerate issues because the tools weren't well made, so making the change from single-core to multi-core archetecture was difficult.


*applaud* .
Website Version: 1.0.4
© 2025 Max Games. All rights reserved.