I don't disagree with anything my results. Seems fairly accurate.

Quote from Envoy

I don't disagree with anything my results. Seems fairly accurate.

Ladies and gentlemen a volunteer.

Quote from Envoy

I don't disagree with anything my results. Seems fairly accurate.

ISTP.

Introvert - I had a tough time thinking if whether you're an Introvert or an Extrovert. I mean, both fit you so well(As far as my knowledge about you goes) but I ended up going for Introvert since you do give off an enigmatic aura. Well, I guess it's not really an introvert but you get the idea.

Sensing - Just a gut feeling.

Thinking - You're the type who brings out the facts and statistics when needed(Hell, you even created a very long statement on beating up 5th graders) but you also balance your emotions.

Perceiving - You tend to just sit back and watch the show unfold.

I tend to agree with Zero's guess about Envoy.


I am INTP

http://www.humanmetrics.com/personality/intp

Not gonna participate, but I thought I would share my results anyway, because I have taken hundreds of random personality tests, and this one has most accurately described me. Regardless, these tests are based on questionable logic and dodgy algorithms, and high general in that they can apply to almost anyone. However, I thought this conclusion hit the mark.

Albert Einstein and Charles Darwin were also INTP apparently. Swag.

Zero gives a good description only that the definitions may be jumbled. I like the number balance.

And Gandalf the Grey biatch! Yeah!

Edit: Still yet to see Extroverts or Sensing. Someone break the cycle!

Quote from Envoy

Edit: Still yet to see Extroverts or Sensing. Someone break the cycle!

Could it be a pattern in the forum's behavior?

Quote from Envoy

Zero gives a good description only that the definitions may be jumbled. I like the number balance.

And Gandalf the Grey biatch! Yeah!

Edit: Still yet to see Extroverts or Sensing. Someone break the cycle!

Ah damn.

My bad. I tried looking for a definition page in the site Jutsu gave but I couldn't find any. So, it's my turn then.

Maybe. For all we know the sensing extroverted folks may be too good to take the test.

Quote from Azure Kite

Could it be a pattern in the forum's behavior?

Dont people goto forums to assume a pseudonym so they can act like something they aren't?

Quote from Zero

Ah damn.

My bad. I tried looking for a definition page in the site Jutsu gave but I couldn't find any. So, it's my turn then.

http://www.humanmetrics.com/personality/intj I believe you're looking for this.

and yeah, zero's turn.

Quote from Hewitt

Dont people goto forums to assume a pseudonym so they can act like something they aren't?

Really? Huh, I never thought of it that way.

Quote from Jutsu

http://www.humanmetrics.com/personality/intj

Oh, I already checked these definitions but I meant the specific traits such as how they define "Introvert" or "Extrovert". Well, a quick Google search could solve this but I was thinking maybe the guys at the website had a different outlook on them.

Well, an introvert tends to refer to a person who keeps to themselves or small, close groups. Basically, they're not socialites.

On the opposite side of the spectrum, extroverts tend to need to be around large groups of people, have an easy time getting along with people, and are certainly socialites.

That's the general view of them, anyways.

Right, an easy way to determine what type you may be is whether or not you recharge by spending time alone or time with others.

Quote from Jutsu

Right, an easy way to determine what type you may be is whether or not you recharge by spending time alone or time with others.

And here is where my Introversion rated at 22% for. I recharge either alone or with people I can acknowledge as friends. I'm also essentially an extrovert when amongst friends, with my introversion taking precedence in large groups of unknowns I'm uncomfortable around. Primarily, formal events. Take me to a convention, though, and I'll have a jolly good time, because I know exactly what I can work with as a starting point.