Madhatter's Sig Shop/Gallary
Started by: MadHatter | Replies: 60 | Views: 3,706
Jan 31, 2008 9:40 PM #81005
Wait, are you talking about the one with the monkey pointing, or are you talking about the one I just made with the frog?
Feb 2, 2008 3:05 AM #81410
Quote from madhatter666UPDATE: New froggy sig. I attemted to do the same kind of style as my flower one, but it turned out completely different.
Any comments on this at all?
Feb 2, 2008 5:25 PM #81515
Good concept, executed badly.
Feb 3, 2008 12:24 AM #81599
Is this what you are thinking of. If not just tell me to redo and an idea, because it's kind of hard to know what you will like without you telling me.

Lol flamming cake.

Lol flamming cake.
Feb 3, 2008 1:46 AM #81615
No offence, but these are really bad. Thats how it always goes though. Youll look back on these as terrible when you get better.
i wouldent be giving them out.
i wouldent be giving them out.
Feb 3, 2008 2:55 AM #81653
Thanks for explaining exactly why you think they are bad :/ More info, madhatter's sigs have a certain style, mostly high contrast and it's very saturated.
Feb 3, 2008 3:42 AM #81668
Quote from Bubba JonesNo offence, but these are really bad. Thats how it always goes though. Youll look back on these as terrible when you get better.
i wouldent be giving them out.
Umm. If you would look at my first page I acutally have a couple of what I think are some decent sigs, and unless you tell me what you find is wrong I suggest you leave my thread.
@AF Yeah, I wasn't particularly pleased with how this one came out that is why I asked if diggory would want me to redo it.
Feb 3, 2008 4:19 AM #81676
Quote from Skeet Peteyou suck
Skeet had it right. Look in his sig if you want to see an example of a good sig.
Why do you suck? Well because photoshop has a long learning curve, and pretty much everyone sucks for quite a while. More specifically, you use lame effects, dont do much to edit the picture, have no flow, there monotone, bad composition, terrible lighting, etc...
Im not saying im any better, but you need to read some tutorials, thats how youll learn.
Feb 3, 2008 5:16 AM #81688
Photoshop is ****ing easy to use.
Skeet's sigs are nice, but his style is not for everyone.
Skeet's sigs are nice, but his style is not for everyone.
Feb 3, 2008 5:50 AM #81694
Its easy to use if you just blur, colorize, smudge, and a bunch of other lame stuff.
You really have no clue what your talking about.
If you dont believe me, go to artisticgfx.com and post in the update your rank section and youll see how bad you both are.
You really have no clue what your talking about.
If you dont believe me, go to artisticgfx.com and post in the update your rank section and youll see how bad you both are.
Feb 3, 2008 6:30 AM #81698
And how do you know what you are talking about, nigger?
Feb 3, 2008 7:07 AM #81700
Quote from madhatter666Is this what you are thinking of. If not just tell me to redo and an idea, because it's kind of hard to know what you will like without you telling me.
Lol flamming cake.
i want you to take that, and some how revert the cake to it's origanal colors.
edit: just tell em hwo to make fire lol.
Feb 3, 2008 10:25 AM #81727
Quote from adrenalineflashAnd how do you know what you are talking about, nigger?
Because Im not a blind little immature dope, and because ive read tutorials, seen lots of art etc...
If you think photoshop is easy you know your making crappy art.
Feb 8, 2008 1:08 AM #82447
Quote from Bubba JonesBecause Im not a blind little immature dope, and because ive read tutorials, seen lots of art etc...
If you think photoshop is easy you know your making crappy art.
Let's see some of your art work, see if you're better than madhatter666.
If you've read tutorials, I'd like links, your product, and some ****ing evidence that you're way better than hatter.