Humans: Animals?
Started by: Zed | Replies: 82 | Views: 3,413
Gavel2Posts: 6,675
Joined: Oct 2006
Rep: 10
View Profile The reason it's hard to understand is because a. as humans we can not imagine the mind of a different creature any more than we can explain color to a blind man and b. intelligence is relitave. Perhaps we are the dominant species on earth because the mice and the dolphins are gifted with amazing physical traits as well and they have less need for intelligence. I say intelligence is relitave because different people think of it in different ways. The obvious argument to mice being more intelligent than us is "why haven't they made a computer yet? Or made any tool whatsoever? Or even discover fire?" Whereas some people think, "they figured out the puzzle faster than any human, even if they were the same running speed! Incredible!" What I'm trying to say is that there are different kinds of intelligence, and just because the mouse one is technically smarter doesn't mean it's more practical.
Imagine a bear, who is obviously dominant to a rabbit, saying the same thing. "The rabbit has speed, but we have our claws and our strategy." All species are seperated like this, but since we are human, we like to put ourselves in the center.
(that was not an insult)
What the hell? You guys were playing the "Fail to see the Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy reference" game without me?
anfu2Posts: 40
Joined: May 2007
Rep: 10
View Profile Oh, lol, sorry, I was just using that as an example, not trying to single you out
Zed2Posts: 11,572
Joined: Feb 2009
Rep: 10
View Profile Well, let's see....
Firstly, we all agree that humans are animals, since we are all obviously consciously alive. It is also obvious that we have intelligence. Animals also are proven to have intellegence(we both have instinct, too, but that's not the point). The difference is nothing more or less than the ability we were created with. Let me explain.
When man was first created, however you believe, he was put here along with all these other animals that science has proven were here long before him. It seems logical to assume that man was not at the top of the food chain from the beginning. In the jungle, he had to hide from tigers, so he learned to climb a tree. In the forest, he had to run from the bear. Other animals were created with the physical ability to do these things. Humans were created with the mental ability. Same thing with those below us; bears have claws and teeth, eagles have talons. Humans, with their obviously weak bodies, have only their minds, and in turn the tools they create.
I object to your use of the word "create" but you have the general idea. Humans evolved. Other animals evolved. Therefore any differences are just different adaptations to the environment.
alive2Posts: 1,331
Joined: May 2007
Rep: 10
View Profile Oh, lol, sorry, I was just using that as an example, not trying to single you out
He'll be fine man. Don't worry about it.
ssprosPosts: 6
Joined: Sep 2009
Rep: 10
View Profile I think We are pretty much animals but with a stronger curiosity, and evolved quicker. If we didnt then us might be crabs.
*sorry for bad spelling ad grammar
En2Posts: 2,481
Joined: May 2009
Rep: 10
View Profile I think that animals have a different BMR rate and MEtabolism. I learnt that in school. =D
OH yea and obviuosly the appearence.
Zed2Posts: 11,572
Joined: Feb 2009
Rep: 10
View Profile I think We are pretty much animals but with a stronger curiosity, and evolved quicker. If we didnt then us might be crabs.
*sorry for bad spelling ad grammar
We didn't evolve quicker. We just evolved different. Humans are no more advanced evolutionarily than algae.
bubblesBannedPosts: 1,633
Joined: Sep 2009
Rep: 10
View Profile Physical attributes are not important. Animals adapt to their surroundings whereas humans manipulate their surroundings.
But basically what separates humans from animals is written language, organized society, infinite curiosity and struggle for understanding.
what about ants? do they not have and equelly if not superior orginization? yes they do.
as for everything else, I agree with you.