Rust and other chemical reactions

Started by: quake | Replies: 13 | Views: 1,283

quake

Posts: 999
Joined: Dec 2006
Rep: 10

View Profile
Aug 27, 2009 11:23 PM #479715
Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Top = Oldest
Bottom= new

I think the latest is the bestest
quake

Posts: 999
Joined: Dec 2006
Rep: 10

View Profile
Aug 29, 2009 1:22 AM #480156
Image

:o
quake

Posts: 999
Joined: Dec 2006
Rep: 10

View Profile
Aug 30, 2009 4:48 AM #480776
What the phuck...46 views and not one post?

also Image
quake

Posts: 999
Joined: Dec 2006
Rep: 10

View Profile
Sep 1, 2009 4:34 AM #481841
Image

Image

Image
CGIllusion
2

Posts: 617
Joined: Aug 2005
Rep: 21

View Profile
Sep 1, 2009 5:19 AM #481850
For the sake of commenting, I like the last two. I'm not one to critique photoshop stuffs.
Dudeman
2

Posts: 2,206
Joined: Aug 2005
Rep: 10

View Profile
Sep 1, 2009 5:23 AM #481853
Quote from quake
Image

I like this one the most. Very snazzy.

I don't like the alex mercer one. The image seems like it's in a bad spot and the little blue dots seem really ugly. That's about the only one I can write a good review for.
quake

Posts: 999
Joined: Dec 2006
Rep: 10

View Profile
Sep 1, 2009 12:23 PM #481968
Quote from CGIllusion
For the sake of commenting, I like the last two. I'm not one to critique photoshop stuffs.


Holy shit...someone posted haha. Thanks =]
Quote from Dudeman
I like this one the most. Very snazzy.

I don't like the alex mercer one. The image seems like it's in a bad spot and the little blue dots seem really ugly. That's about the only one I can write a good review for.


That one was one if the first stocks I worked with, I liked how it came out, but I feel it'd be better if the left side of white was transparent. The Alex Mercer was quickly thrown together during Study Hall yesterday because a freind wanted to see basicly how I make sigs so I just showed her a few different ways. Smudging, C4d(the dots) etc etc. I liked the sig when I first made it, but now its a case of the more I look at it the more I dislike it.

I'll probably have some more later. Thanks for the comments guys
RetroMonster

Posts: 9
Joined: Dec 2007
Rep: 10

View Profile
Sep 2, 2009 6:30 PM #482570
nice man, what tuts you use?
Wtf
2

Posts: 5,683
Joined: Oct 2006
Rep: 10

View Profile
Sep 2, 2009 7:04 PM #482585
Image
This one is great
Incredible blend you did there.

And RetroMonster, I actually doubt he uses any kind of tutorial. He's just naturally great.
quake

Posts: 999
Joined: Dec 2006
Rep: 10

View Profile
Sep 4, 2009 12:55 AM #483462
Tutorials are a really good way to learn, and I encourage people to always look at tuts... But I never base a sig off a tut. I never follow it step by step. I look at tuts to learn different styles and tricks. Also, new stuff.

Image

Image

Image

Image
LN3uq
2

Posts: 2,457
Joined: Dec 2004
Rep: 35

View Profile
Sep 4, 2009 1:27 AM #483491
Quote from quake
What the phuck...46 views and not one post?

also Image

This is nice, Although I'd do without the line that covers up his face and keep the one that sort of outlines it. Also, the left side's sort of weird, not a fan

Quote from quake
Image

:o

This is pretty sick, it could be cooler though if instead of just using the wave filter(or whatever you did) on the smoky stuff you did some more smudging to it
also, I don't like where your name is, not sure where I'd put it, but eh

The newer ones I don't like as much. Third one's pretty neat, but the first two are just too saturated for me
Flood
2

Posts: 3,326
Joined: Dec 2008
Rep: 10

View Profile
Sep 4, 2009 2:58 AM #483537
Can you make me a sig.
quake

Posts: 999
Joined: Dec 2006
Rep: 10

View Profile
Sep 4, 2009 4:28 AM #483569
Sure, any preferences on how you want it?
Covalence
Banned

Posts: 4,666
Joined: May 2007
Rep: 10

View Profile
Sep 12, 2009 9:14 PM #486800
cool sigs
you got a lot better