Hey man, I never said anything about forcing them to stop, it's their choice and they know what'd happen if they continue. And if you had read the sentence after that, I stated that they should find some other way to negotiate so lives wouldn't be lost/jailed.
I don't care about the Tibetans protesting to China, it's just people are getting angry about the fact that the Chinese are jailing and killing the protesters. If they know the consequences and they're still pushing to protest, I really have nothing to say.
What I'm trying to say is if they want to continue, do whatever, just don't drag down the olympics while they're at it. Call me ignorant, but enough is enough. Knock down one torch, good, the world gets the message, so why continue?
No offense, but you seem really naive about this.
Not every cause can be fought in a conveniently safe, simple, or even legal way. When you're dealing with a corrupt government, do you really think they are just going to put up a big proverbial suggestion box to allow their detractors a say in what they do? They don't have any obligation whatsoever to simply allow protestors a chance to speak, if you want to get a message out, sometimes you have to fight someone to do so.
You're trying to justify the evils of these governments by saying that it is the fault of the protesters for fighting against something even when they knew the consequences, and that they should've found some "other way of negotiating".
So I ask you this:
What the hell are you supposed to do when there is no other way of negotiating? Just give up to avoid getting hurt? If people had this attitude none of histories most important revolutions ever would've happened. We would all probably still be controlled by monarchies if that were the case.