The Spanish Inquisition occurred. Therefore god does not exist.
Discuss.
God Does Exist
Started by: Ash | Replies: 75 | Views: 4,491
Oct 24, 2009 3:38 PM #505451
Oct 24, 2009 3:47 PM #505452
The spanish do not exist. Therefore the spanish inquisition did not occur. Therefore god exists.
Oct 24, 2009 3:51 PM #505453
The platypus exists. Therefore the Spanish are footjobs wearing tutus.
Oct 24, 2009 3:59 PM #505455
Spaniards are less likely to prove for I am also not aware of my right molars.
Oct 24, 2009 4:09 PM #505462
Indeed the fun goose faught interestingly, but driving is never a sock's favorite toy.
Oct 24, 2009 4:16 PM #505464
Quote from AshIndeed the fun goose faught interestingly,
Oh come now Marxy it isn't SO bad being raped, fabricate the 3 truckers in their world who chose you! You can still maybe live someone else's life of hapiness with an awful job.
Quote from Ashbut driving is never a sock's favorite toy.
It actually compels the rooster having his stomach filled with his own eyes.
Oct 24, 2009 4:29 PM #505468
I must compel defeat, as it is knightly to feed the only furrow in one's brow as a flash drive connects to the surprise.
Oct 24, 2009 5:23 PM #505482
You may be right.
The holocaust happened so god doesn't exist.
The holocaust happened so god doesn't exist.
Oct 24, 2009 5:27 PM #505485
Of course God doesn't exist. Wtf man.
Oct 24, 2009 5:27 PM #505486
That's the idea!
This is now the non sequitur thread.
This is now the non sequitur thread.
Oct 24, 2009 5:29 PM #505487
Non sequitor?
Speak English, man. You don't see me speaking Slovene here without translation either. Or German. Or Russian.
Speak English, man. You don't see me speaking Slovene here without translation either. Or German. Or Russian.
Oct 24, 2009 5:31 PM #505488
Well pretty much yeah... of course he doesn't.
Oct 24, 2009 5:35 PM #505492
Mantha, it's a pretty common term. It mean "doesn't follow", it's a logical fallacy for when someone presents a logical argument that says that one thing leads from another without that actually being the case.
For example, it would be a non-sequitur to say "If you have visited the White House, you have been to Washington DC, therefore if you have not been to the White House you have not been to Washington DC."
Go check out Exilement's Logical Fallacies thread, it lists it.
For example, it would be a non-sequitur to say "If you have visited the White House, you have been to Washington DC, therefore if you have not been to the White House you have not been to Washington DC."
Go check out Exilement's Logical Fallacies thread, it lists it.
Oct 24, 2009 5:46 PM #505500
I've never heard of it and I don't care much about logical fallacies.
Oct 24, 2009 5:49 PM #505505
Well this is the debate section. It's kind of important to know how to spot and avoid them if you want to debate better. Not that you don't debate well, quite the contrary, but it never hurts to learn a little more about it.