I got into a large argument yesterday and was wondering what do you think would have happened had the beatles not existed?
Would another band just like them have filled their place?
Or would music nowadays be hugely altered due to that?
What if The Beatles didn't exist?
Started by: Wartooth | Replies: 14 | Views: 1,743
Mar 3, 2010 3:58 PM #552721
Mar 3, 2010 5:47 PM #552737
Probably every style they play with would be played in several different bands.
Maybe we still wouldn't have left the 80's song era.
Which would have been great
Maybe we still wouldn't have left the 80's song era.
Which would have been great
Mar 3, 2010 7:48 PM #552748
We wouldn't know what we're missing out on, if anything.
I don't think the Beatles did anything so unbelievably experimental that it's something other musicians wouldn't have been able to figure out in the same time period. Hendrix did a ton of experimental stuff with recording, just to name one artist, and plenty of other groups of the time would have put us largely where we're at now as far as stylistic experimentation goes.
I don't think the Beatles did anything so unbelievably experimental that it's something other musicians wouldn't have been able to figure out in the same time period. Hendrix did a ton of experimental stuff with recording, just to name one artist, and plenty of other groups of the time would have put us largely where we're at now as far as stylistic experimentation goes.
Mar 4, 2010 1:23 AM #552816
There would be no Beatles Rock Band.
Mar 4, 2010 1:40 AM #552821
Other artists or bands would have filled the gap, music might be a bit different, but it's not like it would be some crazy backwards music scene.
Mar 4, 2010 1:50 AM #552824
I've always enjoyed the Beatles, but have never been a huge fan. I agree with Exilement, that they were never insanely different, and they didn't ever do anything that other bands and artists couldn't. I'm sure that if they didn't exist, the hole would be filled in by any other artist/s. There were hundreds of others musicians who's style greatly affected our music today, and The Beatles were a small part of that. Of course they were a huge hit, but I don't think music today would be that dramatically altered if they never existed.
Mar 4, 2010 3:16 AM #552838
Wouldn't matter to me, I didn't like the Beatles too much. But it's impossible to know, a lot less bands would've been inspired to be great I guess.
Mar 4, 2010 5:49 AM #552878
life wouldn't suck, that's what
Mar 4, 2010 8:22 AM #552921
Elvis Presley would then be the greatest selling artist of all time. Although Michael Jackson is due to pass him up.
Mar 4, 2010 2:50 PM #552975
Most likely AFRICA. They didn't have a revolutionary style or anything so it wouldn't make much difference otherwise.
Mar 4, 2010 3:45 PM #552987
Quote from GR4Y-F0XThey didn't have a revolutionary style or anything so it wouldn't make much difference otherwise.
I have to think you've never actually listened to much of the Beatles.
Mar 5, 2010 1:30 AM #553106
They were the first major band to really take advantage of what a recording studio could do and get it popular, to get that psychedelic sound they had,
So I'll take the opposite side and say that we may be stuck with music from a few generations back.
So I'll take the opposite side and say that we may be stuck with music from a few generations back.
Mar 5, 2010 4:09 AM #553145
You have to remember all the artist's the Beatles supported and helped rise to fame during their time. Most notably The Rolling Stones. You have to consider more than just their music.
Mar 5, 2010 5:39 AM #553155
Good point Orion!
Mar 5, 2010 7:09 AM #553173
Not to mention all of the thousands of cover songs by other artists that wouldn't exist.