A Big Bang Circular Rotation.
Started by: VToon2886 | Replies: 93 | Views: 6,348
Apr 28, 2012 8:38 PM #644764
Good question, I don't think I know the answer to that, but here is a guess, a bunch of nuclear atoms fused together and created a ticking "Time bomb". It may appear as that so much gathered that it actually got too big for it's size, so, like a bomb, it exploded outwards and created the universe as we know today, either that, or, like I said, it actually became a , "Nuclear Super Nova" and created the universe.
Apr 28, 2012 8:50 PM #644767
nukes... causing a big bang... seriously.
The big bang formed the universe because of what was contained within it. trillions of quarks and strange objects of subatomic size- blasting out and colliding with eachotehr.
And in the same thousandths of a second a near = amount of anti particles jet out. Creating insane explosions of energy when colliding with a counter part.
(As we think,) the balance was similar to some insane number of anti-matter, to the same amount of normal matter- plus one.
In under a second all anti-matter is wiped out and the normal matter proliferates freely and combines- forming gravitational pulls and getting even bigger and more complex.
Hydroxen is formed- then oxygen- then helium and maybe even carbon. The earliest table of elements being filled- and these clusters just keep combining and shooting out at extreme speeds. They slow down as they become more massive but keep spreading, causing the current expansion of the universe to still happen.
Then protostars form- systems, galaxies...
Man- always wanted to post that somewhere...
YES! Until someone interferes. ;D
The big bang formed the universe because of what was contained within it. trillions of quarks and strange objects of subatomic size- blasting out and colliding with eachotehr.
And in the same thousandths of a second a near = amount of anti particles jet out. Creating insane explosions of energy when colliding with a counter part.
(As we think,) the balance was similar to some insane number of anti-matter, to the same amount of normal matter- plus one.
In under a second all anti-matter is wiped out and the normal matter proliferates freely and combines- forming gravitational pulls and getting even bigger and more complex.
Hydroxen is formed- then oxygen- then helium and maybe even carbon. The earliest table of elements being filled- and these clusters just keep combining and shooting out at extreme speeds. They slow down as they become more massive but keep spreading, causing the current expansion of the universe to still happen.
Then protostars form- systems, galaxies...
Man- always wanted to post that somewhere...
Quote from VToon2886Are we just in a never ending cycle of big bangs? I would like your opinion on this.
YES! Until someone interferes. ;D
Apr 28, 2012 9:02 PM #644775
Not Nukes, atoms, what do you think nukes explode, with nuclear atoms, that's where they get the word "Nuke" from, dude, ever wonder where the word came from, the excact thing that makes it go, how do I put this, "BIG BOOM". Anyway, the Big Bang must've been, I dunno, like, a thousand nukes combined, that would be a freaking God of nukes right there.
Apr 28, 2012 9:07 PM #644779
no- it's just the universe compilet into a teensy tiny ball- then that ball teleports and breaks apart into little quarks.
Apr 28, 2012 9:10 PM #644783
Yes, that gathered together and created the mother-load of nukes, make sense actually, nuke equals boom, bigger nuke equals bigger boom, Big Bang equals the universe, easy to find. Just a giant nuke that imploded and created the universe.
Apr 29, 2012 12:23 AM #644960
If your thought process can't be followed by a drunk philosophy student (me) then it's not a real thought. Start again from the beginning.
Apr 29, 2012 4:58 AM #645075
Quote from DartagnenYes, that gathered together and created the mother-load of nukes, make sense actually, nuke equals boom, bigger nuke equals bigger boom, Big Bang equals the universe, easy to find. Just a giant nuke that imploded and created the universe.
Not powerful enough.
Quote from DartagnenNot Nukes, atoms, what do you think nukes explode, with nuclear atoms, that's where they get the word "Nuke" from, dude, ever wonder where the word came from, the excact thing that makes it go, how do I put this, "BIG BOOM". Anyway, the Big Bang must've been, I dunno, like, a thousand nukes combined, that would be a freaking God of nukes right there.
Not even close.
Apr 29, 2012 4:50 PM #645491
Quote from DartagnenNot Nukes, atoms, what do you think nukes explode, with nuclear atoms, that's where they get the word "Nuke" from, dude, ever wonder where the word came from, the excact thing that makes it go, how do I put this, "BIG BOOM". Anyway, the Big Bang must've been, I dunno, like, a thousand nukes combined, that would be a freaking God of nukes right there.
That energy is so incomprehensibly small in comparison to other forms of sources (not creation btw) of energy in the universe.
By the time you have read this post the sun has converted billions of times more energy than your scenario.
Apr 29, 2012 7:43 PM #645634
Yeah, since the sun is fucking massive, but nukes are far more efficient in their energy output relative to its size. The largest nuke ever tested was the Tsar Bomba:
"The device was trillions of times more powerful per unit volume in comparison to the material in the sun's fusion core (about 25% of the sun's radius) and it would take about 10 million years for an equivalent volume of the sun's core to produce the same amount of energy as came from within the bomb's casing."
Just an interesting fact.
"The device was trillions of times more powerful per unit volume in comparison to the material in the sun's fusion core (about 25% of the sun's radius) and it would take about 10 million years for an equivalent volume of the sun's core to produce the same amount of energy as came from within the bomb's casing."
Just an interesting fact.
Apr 30, 2012 6:30 PM #646240
Holy crap. It's pretty worrying looking at the bombs they have nowadays as well.
Alright alright, an exploding black hole releases more energy in a second than the sun does in a billion years which is probably still nowhere near enough for a 'creation of universe'.
We should totally create a collapsing gravity bomb sorta thing.
Alright alright, an exploding black hole releases more energy in a second than the sun does in a billion years which is probably still nowhere near enough for a 'creation of universe'.
We should totally create a collapsing gravity bomb sorta thing.
Apr 30, 2012 7:27 PM #646282
The tsar bomba wasn't anything to fuck with. Its shockwave passed around the earth three times.
Apr 30, 2012 7:43 PM #646300
<_< when was it tested? That could have been the thing that broke my fine china that one in-fateful day...;-;
Apr 30, 2012 7:58 PM #646316
Depends if you're more than 50 years old.
Third degree burns at 100km away, Christ.
Third degree burns at 100km away, Christ.
Apr 30, 2012 8:04 PM #646326
Where was it teste? land or water? Only country that I think could stand that would be russia... half the country must be a wasteland
Apr 30, 2012 8:11 PM #646332
Quote from Patt The ODSTWhere was it teste? land or water? Only country that I think could stand that would be russia... half the country must be a wasteland
I don't think you really understand how large the world is.