Wow guys thanks for starting a discussion in my thread...
that's always lovely
if you are still willing to confront each other because of dumb reasons, try using personal messages
trust me, its better than explaining your points of view in a random thread...
Yeah sorry about that. I did have a response written to Cronos' last comment, but I decided it was best not to post it considering it would be rude to derail your thread in such a way.
He's not worth a pm either so :/
Look below.
Cronos, nah man his constructive criticism was ok. CC is always good, Arch-Angel was just a little harsh, that's all.
And also maybe a little inexperienced because that explosion was fucking sexy!
I'm harsh because I want people to make sure they understand my points. I never want my criticism to be taken as flaming or trolling, that is counterproductive.
Also, how's this for inexperienced:

Hopefully this helps convey my point. The bottom portion of your explosion where it started did flare, which is good. Having the upper portion flare up isn't good because it basically like saying it's exploding again, but there is no force and there aren't any additional movements. If you take my second drawing where it has the point of origin and the arrows pointing outward, imagine that happening at the three locations where your explosion flares up. There has to be something causing the flare, in your case there is not.