I'm not quite sure if I should be scared of you, Devour, but I'm gonna go with definitely.

itt: you can ask any question... as long as I can google the answer! all other questions will be avoided! who can stump me?!?!?

I'm pretty sure my question isn't against the rules. And google won't get him anywhere B-)

It's from The Chat Thread.

Quote from Devour

I'm pretty sure my question isn't against the rules. And google won't get him anywhere B-)

yeah, and it looks like he decided to not answer it, instead saying

Quote from Corey Rich

I'm not quite sure if I should be scared of you, Devour, but I'm gonna with definitely.

-

Quote from Corey Rich

It's from The Chat Thread.

Wrong. You googled it and got that as the result because it used to be in my signature, but that's not the original source.
you lose

alright here's another simple question that you should actually be able to do -

a .50 kilogram ball traveling at 6.0 m/s collides head-on with a 1.00kg ball moving in the opposite direction at a velocity of -12.0 m/s. the .50kg ball moves away at -14 m/s after the collision. What is the velocity of the second ball?

Index, I didn't say that it has to be a question that I can Google. It just has to be something that isn't personal or sexual. Back when I first started the original thread for this, a friend of mine, Hawk, asked my a question about a TV show called Mork and Mindy. After about an hour of trying to find the answer, I gave up. So, it's not impossible to find a question I can't answer with the requirements that I've asked for. You just have to try hard.

You still didn't answer my question.

You've already been asked two questions that aren't personal or sexual.

Quote from Index

a .50 kilogram ball traveling at 6.0 m/s collides head-on with a 1.00kg ball moving in the opposite direction at a velocity of -12.0 m/s. the .50kg ball moves away at -14 m/s after the collision. What is the velocity of the second ball? [after the collision]

Quote from Devour

There are 10 people sitting at a table. They're all married, so that equals to 5 couples.



Each man and woman need to sit next to their married other. Using the laws of probability, how many different ways is it possible for the group to place themselves at the table?

You're just pretending that they don't exist because you can't do math above a fifth-grade level, LOL!!!

Also, you already got my quote question wrong and it met your requirements, unless you count it as perverted.

Quote from Devour

Oh, so that's how it's going to be. Challenge accepted.

There are 10 people sitting at a table. They're all married, so that equals to 5 couples.



Each man and woman need to sit next to their married other. Using the laws of probability, how many different ways is it possible for the group to place themselves at the table?

Lets see if I still remember this math...120?

Quote from WarCorrespondent

Lets see if I still remember this math...120?

why the fuck are you giving away the answer? Are you Corey? I DIDN'T FUCKING THINK SO!!!!!!!!!111111111

Quote from Index

why the fuck are you giving away the answer?

I think Corey already ran away in shame.

I could be wrong but I think the velocity of the second ball is -4.0 m/s. Oh and what gave you the idea that I said I wasn't going to answer Devour's question?

As for the Chat Thread question, okay, you got me. I didn't feel like checking 1000 pages of posts to see if it was there.

Attention everyone! Index beat me.

Are you happy, now? I never said that no one could beat me. I specifically said that it was possible. And, there, I announced it for you.

So bad.

Quote from Corey Rich

I could be wrong but I think the velocity of the second ball is -4.0 m/s.

you are wrong

it's -2.0 m/s

Quote from Corey Rich

Oh and what gave you the idea that I said I wasn't going to answer Devour's question? He hasn't even asked it yet.

What are you talking about? Yes he has. It's right there— I even quoted it again for you, and warcorrespondent even gave an answer.

this thread is terrible, i should bin it, but I kind of like seeing if you answer things.

by the way, my previous point wasn't to show that it's possible to beat you, it was that you had already been beaten, yet pretended that it was just "possible" and no one had done it yet.