As we all know, Iran and the USA are having major tensions with each other. The idea of war is on our minds at all times. It's almost like we're in a Second Cold War. Well despite how much these two countries hate each other, a news report came in and sort of brought a shock to the world. Apparently in the Gulf of Oman there were a few US sailors who were being attacked by pirates. As they were being attacked they sent out a distress signal to anyone nearby. Well it just so happened that an Iranian patrol heard that the US cargo ship was in distress and actually came and scared off the pirates, later detaining them. Afterwards they thanked each other kindly and went on their way.
This got me thinking. Despite all the hate and contempt we all throw at each other with threats of war and violence, we still co-operate with each other on a personal level and only the economic level of situations destroy our understanding of others and their positions. So the question is, is war really necessary? Or is there a better way to approach these sorts of situations?
Take this for example. We all rave (here in the US) about how much we want the troops out of the Middle East. Yet right now Syria is having a civil war against a tyrant, and the world believes that we should help those civilians that are fighting against an oppressive controller. The governments of the world have taken itty bitty steps with peace plans and sanctions and agreements and it has done nothing to halt the civil war by even a bit. So is arming and strengthening the war a better way to end it?
I myself honestly don't have a stance at the moment, which is why I created this thread. I'm interested on seeing your takes on it.