Actually, we're expected to hit peak production of both oil and phosphorous within the next 50 years. Agriculture is completely dependent on both.

Phosphorous is the scarier of the two, actually, it's the main component of fertilizer and there's no real way to replace it synthetically.

deleted

deleted

You're pointless threads are extremely annoying, and appear nothing but attempts to mock those people who want to seriously debate.

And OF COURSE you're troll. You said "is atlantisin the sea?" in a friggin debate, without offering any actual argument, just saying "HEY DOES ATALANTIS EXIST BALhrhhuihigaighiuag!" (yes, the misspellings were intentional); you're not being serious you're just trying to ruin everybody else's fun.
It's also obvious from the very way you construct your posts that you're not being serious. You put NO effort into them, even without the fact that they're all on trollish subjects. I couldn't even decipher your first post.
I will finish by saying: BLAAAGH!!!!! DONT FEED THE TROLL!!!

Quote from walker90234

You're pointless threads are extremely annoying, and appear nothing but attempts to mock those people who want to seriously debate.

And OF COURSE you're troll. You said "is atlantisin the sea?" in a friggin debate, without offering any actual argument, just saying "HEY DOES ATALANTIS EXIST BALhrhhuihigaighiuag!" (yes, the misspellings were intentional); you're not being serious you're just trying to ruin everybody else's fun.
It's also obvious from the very way you construct your posts that you're not being serious. You put NO effort into them, even without the fact that they're all on trollish subjects. I couldn't even decipher your first post.
I will finish by saying: BLAAAGH!!!!! DONT FEED THE TROLL!!!

S
Lmao SSERVED

tempted to sig it?

i don't think people should be actually living in space, like for their whole normal lives or something. it's way too expensive and risky, for no reason. only difference out there from earth is no gravity. But i did not say that we cannot benefit from space. like someone already said, we can find minerals on other planets/moons/asteroids and use them for our own good, we might even discover intelligent life and communicate. I think people should go to space to benefit earth and the people on it, not just cuz they want to live there.

What about overpopulation? Might have to.

I really don't think people will like to live in space if their bodies will be torn apart by high-energy gamma particles.

Just sayin'.

Gamma "particles" are just radiation, we're exposed to them here on earth. They're not particles and we wouldn't be torn apart.

We've been able to shield astronauts from gamma radiation as long as we've been travelling in space, so that's not even an issue.

Quote from walker90234

You're pointless threads are extremely annoying, and appear nothing but attempts to mock those people who want to seriously debate.

And OF COURSE you're troll. You said "is atlantisin the sea?" in a friggin debate, without offering any actual argument, just saying "HEY DOES ATALANTIS EXIST BALhrhhuihigaighiuag!" (yes, the misspellings were intentional); you're not being serious you're just trying to ruin everybody else's fun.
It's also obvious from the very way you construct your posts that you're not being serious. You put NO effort into them, even without the fact that they're all on trollish subjects. I couldn't even decipher your first post.
I will finish by saying: BLAAAGH!!!!! DONT FEED THE TROLL!!!

You can't decipher deleted?wow.ok,there is something called learning to read.why don't ya try it?its not so hard.the alphabet does not go like "a,b,t,f,v,y,z,k, etc etc.

AHEM

Quote from epicwarlordofpyroland

You can't decipher deleted posts? Wow. Ok,there is something called learning to read. Why don't you try it? It's not so hard. The alphabet does not go like "a, b, t, f, v, y, z, k, etc etc.

Now I can read it!!!
There's something which I like to call learning to write. Why don't you try it? It's really not all that difficult. It's basically putting in capital letters and spaces where they're needed!!! It's SO simple!!! Grammar doesn't go "i like my dog.my dog likes me" it goes "I like my dog. My dog likes me." Quite simple really.

Furthermore, theres another thing I like to call structure! Why don't you try it? It's not so hard. It involves putting your arguments in a clear, concise order that actually makes a point and makes your argument easy to read for those who want to debate!!!!

Theres a thing called relevance. Why don't you try it? It's not so hard. It involves citing relevant sources, and making debates that can have a two sided, clear, opinionated argument, and making points which actually carry an argument forwards.

Theres a thing called NOT REPLACInG YOUR POSTS WITH DELETED. What happens if those points are relevant to the debate? Now they're just spam :P

And @nobody in particular (you picked that name for this very reason didn't you???): There are no such death-gama-particle-radiation in space - the dangerous thing is the lack of gravity. Again, this can be solved with centripetal force.

Ahem, this might be the internet. So what?
I frequent a number of websites concerning Literature, and use it for my work on Shakespeare; do they talk the same way as you two (really you one, because 'lolypoper' is simply an account made by 'epicwarlord' under a different name, if my guess is correct. Wish I had proof though, *grumble, grumble*)just because 'daaahr, dis beez de interwebzes'? NO! They structure their information in a legible format. And they talk about relevant things.
Now, this is a DEBATE forum, and it is basic courtesy to structure your posts in a way that THEY CAN ACTUALLY BE DEBATED OVER! THATS THE POINT!!!!

Furthermore, fixing is better than deleting. That's all I was getting at; stop posting such stupid things in future (by the way, how do YOU know that HE deleted them because i said the don't make sense?)