200 is like average

No top boys are on

Quote from HashBrownTrials

200 is like average

No top boys are on

All day (10-10 EST Time) there are at least 270 online, usually 300

I feel like it's 300 average and +/- 100 users with the fluctuating.

So today I went to the beach, you decide what's next...

A lot of aunties?

okay max has gone too far



Also, I have beat him 5-3, but I lose 90 fking points trying to stop his OOS

He OOSes by creating 3 walls, so if you can stop him before he can do that then you can prevent the OOS

As I said, LOC... you don't want to negotiate with terrorists, they just pull crap like this if you do...

I can understand playing around. Hell, I can understand creating OOS clients and vision hacks. I can kinda sympathise with client side custom statue looks and free membership. I can't possibly condone a brute force for passwords.

I'm adding in some non keyboard characters to my pass to outsmart the brute forcer (it will only spam passwords it thinks might exist, not random unicode characters it's never thought of) and I recommend all other players do the same.

http://fsymbols.com/keyboard/windows/alt-codes/list/

ESPECIALLY ADMINS

If all of us have non brute forcable passwords then Max can't offer $2.99 to unban people.

Quote from Skeletonxf

I can understand playing around. Hell, I can understand creating OOS clients and vision hacks. I can kinda sympathise with client side custom statue looks and free membership. I can't possibly condone a brute force for passwords.

I'm adding in some non keyboard characters to my pass to outsmart the brute forcer (it will only spam passwords it thinks might exist, not random unicode characters it's never thought of) and I recommend all other players do the same.

http://fsymbols.com/keyboard/windows/alt-codes/list/

ESPECIALLY ADMINS

If all of us have non brute forcable passwords then Max can't offer $2.99 to unban people.

strongly agree

i can understand any features, oos is not a severe cheat in my mind

I remember there was once a player called Antis(Lanicifir), he was a 2.5k order player with extremely good skill
he used to be a cheater who oos the game whenever he lost games due to lag/unfair situations. But I can understand his action as he really had the skill to actually play.

Same for another player Stickdaddy(Truthful/Honesty), also used to oos games as well.

But I don't really blame their actions

However, brute force for passwords, it is completely destroying other players and cannot be tolerated.

Quote from alternate

As I said, LOC... you don't want to negotiate with terrorists, they just pull crap like this if you do...

First, he's not a terrorist but CJ should be able to press charges against him as they are in the same country (Max has made CJ lose, hundreds, possibly thousands of revenue)

Second, there was no negotiation. He was being ignored as he kept to himself, but now, as has been said, he's clearly taking it too far.

--

I think SE should know more about this, but limit what info they receive so they don't go buying the hacks

Myst, I don't get how you don't blame their actions? How is it okay to OOS? I could see if they were OOSing against a know really laggy player to avoid an unfair loss (like with terrorist allah man and his 84 alts... ) or if they were avoiding slipnot...

Quote from alternate

Myst, I don't get how you don't blame their actions? How is it okay to OOS? I could see if they were OOSing against a know really laggy player to avoid an unfair loss (like with terrorist allah man and his 84 alts... ) or if they were avoiding slipnot...

OOSing is avoiding a loss. That's all it can do. You can't hack the game to win. You can just hack to avoid losing. OOS can be seen as a sort of anti bs tool that hackers seem to like to have. I can't condone using it to build up win streaks, but using it to avoid situations one shouldn't have to be in in the first place I can understand.

Quote from alternate

Myst, I don't get how you don't blame their actions? How is it okay to OOS? I could see if they were OOSing against a know really laggy player to avoid an unfair loss (like with terrorist allah man and his 84 alts... ) or if they were avoiding slipnot...

oos is a very bad action if players use this to avoid losing

but if the game is unfair, I think oos is acceptable

you know wt? Everytime I fight slipnot, I want to oos the game because i just don't even want to play with him. If I have the method to oos, I would also do so against players like slipnot

also, oos a game, both players wont lose any points. At least everything remains the same.

Freeze/ lag to win the game is way more troublesome than oos

I hope cj is seeing this...

Alrighty, agree with you all on this... I do hate when I get OOS when winning, like when I was beating max... but it is way better than freezers and other issues... and I wish CJ made a tool where you can avoid matches with known low lifes and laggers like slip, chico, etc.