Here's the decription of the skill (it's passive for all Shadowraths):
A passive ability. With each consecutive strike the Shadowrath perform on a target the damage increases up for 5 times.
I know, they already explained the skill but I still don't understand it. What does it mean that it only stacks up to 5 times? I also once experienced myself doing more damage with a group of Shadowraths instead of only 1 Shadowrath (Not because of the quantity, it seems like they do more damage in a group instead of alone).
Anyone can help me?
How does Shadowrath's "Fury" work?
Started by: Narsheh | Replies: 18 | Views: 1,064
Mar 3, 2013 11:42 PM #903436
Mar 3, 2013 11:58 PM #903445
He hits you with a stick.
First time, it does 5 damage.
Second time, it does 6 damage.
Next time, it does 7 damage.
Next time, it does 8 damage.
Next time, it does 9 damage.
First time, it does 5 damage.
Second time, it does 6 damage.
Next time, it does 7 damage.
Next time, it does 8 damage.
Next time, it does 9 damage.
Mar 4, 2013 12:12 AM #903451
Tec perfectly described it. You should always time it so that your Shinobi hits on the 5th strike, that way, it's max damage!
Mar 4, 2013 12:39 AM #903464
Quote from KrayZStickTec perfectly described it. You should always time it so that your Shinobi hits on the 5th strike, that way, it's max damage!
I didn't know Shinobi stacks with fury. Are you sure about that?
Mar 4, 2013 12:45 AM #903468
Quote from WyzDMI didn't know Shinobi stacks with fury. Are you sure about that?
Not sure, but always worked for me :D
Mar 4, 2013 12:59 AM #903478
I have used the shadowrath, and never noticed it stacks damage.
Mar 4, 2013 1:14 AM #903485
? I thought that it would activate after the cloak. I'm pretty sure the damage increases after the cloak is over, and sometimes with poison.
Mar 4, 2013 2:45 AM #903565
Does it reset after it does "9 attack"?
Mar 4, 2013 2:49 AM #903573
Hi reader,
I stack Shadowrath...
.:Invincitron:.
I stack Shadowrath...
.:Invincitron:.
Mar 4, 2013 4:17 AM #903630
Quote from NarshehDoes it reset after it does "9 attack"?
No. Let f(n) represent damage done on the nth strike, let d represent the base damage (initial damage done), and let k represent the damage increase per consecutive hit.
f(n) = {
k(n-1) + d for all 1 <= n <= 5
4k + d for all n > 5
}
Mar 4, 2013 4:58 AM #903655
1. Does the ninja have to be firghting the same opponent for the additional damage?
E.g. ninja kits crawler for 5 damage, ninja hits same crawler for 6 damage and kills it. Ninja hits a different crawler, does he hit for 5 (back to start) or 7 (continued to stack) damage.
2. Does moving reset the sequence of increase?
E.g. ninja kits crawler for 5 damage, ninja hits same crawler for 6 damage and kills it. Ninja moves to hit a different crawler, does he hit for 5 (back to start) or 7 (continued to stack) damage.
E.g. ninja kits crawler for 5 damage, crawler runs away and ninja follows so ninja hits same crawler, does he hit for 5 (reset by move) or for 6 damage (sequence of stacking continued. The he killed the crawler so moves to hit a different crawler, how much damage will the first hit on the new target do?
E.g. ninja kits crawler for 5 damage, ninja hits same crawler for 6 damage and kills it. Ninja hits a different crawler, does he hit for 5 (back to start) or 7 (continued to stack) damage.
2. Does moving reset the sequence of increase?
E.g. ninja kits crawler for 5 damage, ninja hits same crawler for 6 damage and kills it. Ninja moves to hit a different crawler, does he hit for 5 (back to start) or 7 (continued to stack) damage.
E.g. ninja kits crawler for 5 damage, crawler runs away and ninja follows so ninja hits same crawler, does he hit for 5 (reset by move) or for 6 damage (sequence of stacking continued. The he killed the crawler so moves to hit a different crawler, how much damage will the first hit on the new target do?
Mar 4, 2013 7:47 PM #904149
ive wondered about this too
Mar 4, 2013 7:52 PM #904158
STOP SAYING "hi reader"
Mar 4, 2013 8:31 PM #904181
It really doesn't matter. If it affects you, just skip over that part. Anyways, I think it works only on the same unit.
Mar 4, 2013 10:09 PM #904241
ill second to that