On topic, thats quite okay for 1300s. But sure, it could improve more.

oooh i luv it, almost betetr then the montage. SUBBED

That's quite good for the 800s.

i can do better if my swordwraths were holding AK-103 not a broad sword...lol

hum..... a kiting archer can do this strategy, won't work on top 100

i like your kills sounds effects lol...
Double Kill!
Triple Kill!
I LOLed while watching

AGH NO (off topic) this thread has been officially infected by shadowy.

Quote from Azxc

hum..... a kiting archer can do this strategy, won't work on top 100

i like your kills sounds effects lol...
Double Kill!
Triple Kill!
I LOLed while watching

not only in the top 100s
i faced such opponent and i defeaded him with sword archi combo, my best kiting ever lol.Im only in the 1350s :P

Your kiting probably consists of...

Actually, I think my infraction limit is 2 points away, so I won't say it.

Anyways, on topic, I don't think this was a real match, just pretended...

Can i say the video sucks? Cuz your economy is bad and i can get more swords with RAGE even with more miners.

Actually, it's better if you have less miners. You only need to have enough miners to get 125 gold every 12 seconds, and the more miners you have, the less amount of space for swords

Quote from DragonFrost

Actually, it's better if you have less miners. You only need to have enough miners to get 125 gold every 12 seconds, and the more miners you have, the less amount of space for swords

More miners = faster eco.
Faster eco = better army.
Better army = win.

So...

Quote from _Aiman_

More miners = faster eco.
Faster eco = better army.
Better army = win.

So...

He was taking about spamming swords. So in that case, you need about 2 miners or something.

but more miners=less room for an army
so you always have to count that factor in

Quote from blu3blitz

but more miners=less room for an army
so you always have to count that factor in

Surely you can sacrifice them?