I'm gunning for all of you up there. Don't get too comfy >=)
After all, I tied you Error. I'm calling that a draw in my book lol. Which means you just made my s**t list, congrats on being number 2. Blak is number 1 (he knows why).
Which leads to my other point. I like Blak's idea of the round 2 losers fighting the Loser's winners. It would make another round of point scoring for us, which makes BOTH the winner's and loser's have a cumulative point score for 2 rounds (for now). That would make it so winning based off the point system is acceptable and fair, since whether you joined the Loser's or Winner's, you had the same opportunity of points when you teach the top. This would also mean that after this round of Loser's (rebel 1!) and the upcoming "heist" round (rebel 2!) we'd need another round (rebel 3!) to even up the winner of "blow by blow", since by then that winner will have done "evening the odds", "lost and found", and "blow by blow" itself. This would also mean that the winner of "blow by blow" would take a break while the Loser's do their round 3.
And if this was already scheduled and I just ruined something, or if there's another plan to even the points, then consider the above statement as ramblings from a mad man.
EDIT: this would also mean that a loser of "lost and found" would not get points for the Loser's bracket "heist" round. His point score for that round would determine whether he moves to a round 3 then be removed from the point count for the following round and determining the entire tournament's (burrito) supreme victor.
wRHG Tournament Discussion Thread | CONGRATULATIONS TO THE WINNER!
Started by: Hewitt | Replies: 261 | Views: 27,634
Sep 9, 2013 7:29 PM #1081900
Sep 9, 2013 7:41 PM #1081906
I find your proposal interesting guys~
I relish the challenge! >D
I relish the challenge! >D
Sep 9, 2013 9:04 PM #1081942
Oh yeah? I mustard it.
.....your move >=)
.....your move >=)
Sep 9, 2013 9:13 PM #1081946
Sorry I'm going to have to decline. I'm a bit "pickle" when I choose my opponents xP
Sep 10, 2013 12:44 AM #1082040
Quote from BirtDogWhich leads to my other point. I like Blak's idea of the round 2 losers fighting the Loser's winners. It would make another round of point scoring for us, which makes BOTH the winner's and loser's have a cumulative point score for 2 rounds (for now). That would make it so winning based off the point system is acceptable and fair, since whether you joined the Loser's or Winner's, you had the same opportunity of points when you teach the top. This would also mean that after this round of Loser's (rebel 1!) and the upcoming "heist" round (rebel 2!) we'd need another round (rebel 3!) to even up the winner of "blow by blow", since by then that winner will have done "evening the odds", "lost and found", and "blow by blow" itself. This would also mean that the winner of "blow by blow" would take a break while the Loser's do their round 3
That would be a good idea, if it wasn't such a managerial nightmare. And it's not fair to the R1 Losers who worked so hard moving on to go up against the R2 losers who've already had 2 battles under their belt.
Idea denied.
Sep 10, 2013 2:42 AM #1082105
Quote from Nikx232Sorry I'm going to have to decline. I'm a bit "pickle" when I choose my opponents xP
....worchestire...balls in your court
Quote from HewittThat would be a good idea, if it wasn't such a managerial nightmare. And it's not fair to the R1 Losers who worked so hard moving on to go up against the R2 losers who've already had 2 battles under their belt.
Idea denied.
Understandable. How dare you propose such hardship, Blak. I apologize for my friend Hewitt, you glorious falcon-man.
Sep 10, 2013 2:56 AM #1082113
gouda for you BirtDog but I'd rather fillet out of here :U
*flies away with the fishes into the double rainbow in the sky*
*flies away with the fishes into the double rainbow in the sky*
Sep 10, 2013 2:59 AM #1082114
Quote from Nikx232gouda for you BirtDog but I'd rather fillet out of here :U
*flies away with the fishes into the double rainbow in the sky*
Oh yeah?

Now I win...I LOVE winning!
EDIT: we should stop this conversation. It's getting out of hand lol
Sep 10, 2013 3:03 AM #1082118
lol I agree, it was fun while it lasted however~! XD
Sorry Hewitt~! :3
Sorry Hewitt~! :3
Sep 10, 2013 11:19 PM #1082450
Quote from BirtDogI'm gunning for all of you up there. Don't get too comfy >=)
After all, I tied you Error. I'm calling that a draw in my book lol. Which means you just made my s**t list, congrats on being number 2. Blak is number 1 (he knows why).
How did we tie? O_o The scoring was put up.
Anyways, I'll be ready for another battle with you again someday. Until then, reverse-catbug.
Sep 11, 2013 1:07 AM #1082508
Everyone, save your stories (even the ones that aren't yours if you're feeling generous) and back them up. In lieu of recent events, this place might lose its shit because of hacking. I actually have the semi-final thread almost up and running...but i'm thinking of postponing it because I'm afraid TheSaw might rollback the site again or something, and this next round is time-critical.
By the by, there's been word going around that Chamel wants to give up his place so blakphoenix can participate in the Semi-Finals. It wasn't "fair" for TheOrg to lose like that and it seems more exciting to let blak move on seeing as I myself said he and loboto had equal chance. I need your opinions on this. I already have blak and Loboto's answer. PM me or post your thoughts here (specifically Strongest and Error, but anyone can say anything).
By the by, there's been word going around that Chamel wants to give up his place so blakphoenix can participate in the Semi-Finals. It wasn't "fair" for TheOrg to lose like that and it seems more exciting to let blak move on seeing as I myself said he and loboto had equal chance. I need your opinions on this. I already have blak and Loboto's answer. PM me or post your thoughts here (specifically Strongest and Error, but anyone can say anything).
Sep 11, 2013 1:15 AM #1082511
I'm all for it ._. (LOL)
I didn't feel like it was a fair fight between me and TheOrg because he can (hopefully) write a better piece than the one he submitted :/ Other than that, Blak placed 4th in overall rankings he deserves to move on (if he wishes of course).
So YEH
I didn't feel like it was a fair fight between me and TheOrg because he can (hopefully) write a better piece than the one he submitted :/ Other than that, Blak placed 4th in overall rankings he deserves to move on (if he wishes of course).
So YEH
Sep 11, 2013 1:16 AM #1082514
I just don't wanna hear anything like "OMG Is that the next Round?! I shouldn't have quit I'm good at this!" from you Chamel XD
Sep 11, 2013 1:19 AM #1082520
I think what has happened has happened and we should just move on with what we have regardless of what was fair or not. Just because Organ could have written a better piece doesn't change the fact that the one he wrote was not. You have been blessed Cham with this opportunity and I think we should all just move on so as not to cause anymore headaches. (Specifically talking about the loser's bracket's situation)
Sep 11, 2013 1:43 AM #1082530
Quote from HewittI just don't wanna hear anything like "OMG Is that the next Round?! I shouldn't have quit I'm good at this!" from you Chamel XD
You sir, probably know me a bit too well, especially from the Internet ._. Besides... I don't say "OMG" very often ._.
HAHA~ I might stay... Imma leave the choice up to Blak. If he feels that he wants to take Lobo on one more time, than he can, if not, I'll continue on into the third round.