Is being militant in your theistic/atheistic beliefs important?
Started by: Automaton | Replies: 30 | Views: 1,376
Salt2Posts: 5,455
Joined: Jun 2012
Rep: 10
View Profile Stephen Fry has been ostracized and degraded by theists because of his sexuality. I remember reading a piece he wrote awhile back about his depression and suicidal thoughts.
He has every right to oppose those who tell him he's a second rate citizen. Your mum shouldn't be throwing around the term arrogance so loosely.
It's important to express ones opinions. Atheists do it all too often. But it's not us that should be doing the convincing. It's theists. Not a single shred of evidence has ever arisen suggesting the legitimacy of any one of these cults. The thinking man has a right to question that which has no evidence, without fear of being labeled arrogant or strident. People give theism far too much respect.
I tell you there's a dragon in my backyard, you ask for proof. I tell you I am a 'mono-theist', you accept it. Don't.
And let's all make sure we make the important, correct, distinction between theism and deism. Deism is an uneducated cop-out. It's a guess based on ignorance (I will grant it's possibly true, but there is currently no evidence to suggest it). The good thing about deism... it doesn't harm anybody. Theism is the embodiment of human narcissism. It harms people everyday, whether you like it or not.
Explain to me how theism has harmed anyone.
CronosPosts: 5,440
Joined: Apr 2009
Rep: 10
View Profile Salt2Posts: 5,455
Joined: Jun 2012
Rep: 10
View Profile ...
I know what your thinking. Tell me, and I can disprove it.
CronosPosts: 5,440
Joined: Apr 2009
Rep: 10
View Profile No, that question seriously does not deserve a reply.
ExileAdministrator2Posts: 8,404
Joined: Dec 2005
Rep: 10
View Profile "Herbert and Catherine Schaible belong to a fundamentalist Christian church that believes in faith healing. They lost their 8-month-old son, Brandon, last week after he suffered from diarrhea and breathing problems for at least a week, and stopped eating... they told police that they prayed for God to heal Brandon instead of taking him to a doctor when he fell ill.
Four years ago, another son died from bacterial pneumonia. That boy, a two-year-old named Kent, died after the Schaibles refused to take him to the doctor when he became sick, relying instead on faith and prayer."
I really don't think this is relevant to anything, religion isn't inherently harmful just because there are examples of harm caused by religious motivations, but it does happen and you're delusional if you believe otherwise.
Salt2Posts: 5,455
Joined: Jun 2012
Rep: 10
View Profile "Herbert and Catherine Schaible belong to a fundamentalist Christian church that believes in faith healing. They lost their 8-month-old son, Brandon, last week after he suffered from diarrhea and breathing problems for at least a week, and stopped eating... they told police that they prayed for God to heal Brandon instead of taking him to a doctor when he fell ill.
Four years ago, another son died from bacterial pneumonia. That boy, a two-year-old named Kent, died after the Schaibles refused to take him to the doctor when he became sick, relying instead on faith and prayer."
I really don't think this is relevant to anything, religion isn't inherently harmful just because there are examples of harm caused by religious motivations, but it does happen and you're delusional if you believe otherwise.
It does happen, but it's out of people's mistakes. The actual religion has nothing to do with this. Do you seriously think that God would've healed the child if the parents didn't even do anything to help him? That was just out right stupid of them. I have to say, unfortunately many theists are just dumb. They don't practice their own beliefs correctly, and give very bad examples.
ExileAdministrator2Posts: 8,404
Joined: Dec 2005
Rep: 10
View Profile They didn't practice their own beliefs correctly? They believed the lord would cure their illnesses through faith and prayer and that's exactly what they tried to do, and that belief stems from a literal interpretation of biblical text. There are several churches and denominations that promote this belief to its followers. How is this not a fault of organized religion?
You're cherry-picking one sentence from cronos' post that you disagree with and trying to "disprove" it with fallacious arguments that don't even apply to the example you asked us to provide. None of this is relevant to the topic either way, so quit focusing on it.
walker90234Posts: 194
Joined: Oct 2009
Rep: 10
View Profile Guys, we've gone waaaay off topic here, and the OP did say that this thread SHOULDN'T be about the benefits/problems of theism/atheism. Any chance we can get back to the matter at hand? Make a new thread if you want to debate religion.
Anyone got any thoughts on my last post? I find the whole liberty of thought argument rather interesting.
Automaton2Posts: 4,779
Joined: Nov 2007
Rep: 10
View Profile I'm going to re-read your post and respond to it at some point (providing I have a response; I haven't read any J.S. Mill. Speaking of which, I take it you would recommend his works?)
GrimmtheReaper2Posts: 1,918
Joined: Feb 2013
Rep: 10
View Profile In my personal, objective view of things, I believe that you have the right to spread your beliefs if you wish to, so long as you do not violate the mandates of your religion *cough* Crusaders *cough cough.* After all, if you preach a religion you do not follow, that would probably be Blaspheme...
But I also believe that in a sense, we are all worshipping the same god, just under different names.
walker90234Posts: 194
Joined: Oct 2009
Rep: 10
View Profile Yeah, I'd most certainly recommend Mill; especially On Liberty. Probably my favourite philosopher of all time.
As for Grimm's post; yes, people have a right to spread beliefs, that's pretty much covered by a right to free speech. But that's not what we're debating; we're debating whether or not spreading your beliefs is a GOOD/MORAL thing, not whether people should be allowed to do it. There's a very important difference. Try reading the OP next time, okay?
GrimmtheReaper2Posts: 1,918
Joined: Feb 2013
Rep: 10
View Profile Yeah, I'd most certainly recommend Mill; especially On Liberty. Probably my favourite philosopher of all time.
As for Grimm's post; yes, people have a right to spread beliefs, that's pretty much covered by a right to free speech. But that's not what we're debating; we're debating whether or not spreading your beliefs is a GOOD/MORAL thing, not whether people should be allowed to do it. There's a very important difference. Try reading the OP next time, okay?
Why do you think I mentioned it's ok if you don't contradict your religion in doing so? That is the moral aspect of it.
alive2Posts: 1,331
Joined: May 2007
Rep: 10
View Profile god damn fuck, I hate my life. I just spent ages on a long reply and shit, but then stickpage decided it doesn't care about my opinions and removed it all. bah, you would have been so enlightened!
Automaton2Posts: 4,779
Joined: Nov 2007
Rep: 10
View Profile god damn fuck, I hate my life. I just spent ages on a long reply and shit, but then stickpage decided it doesn't care about my opinions and removed it all. bah, you would have been so enlightened!
This has happened so many times for me, that I'm now in the habit of "CTRL+A" and "CTRL+C"-ing every 2-3 sentences. It's made my SP posting so much more risk-free. I now don't sit on the edge of my seat with a single drop of sweat dripping down my forehead before I hit the "post reply" button.
alive2Posts: 1,331
Joined: May 2007
Rep: 10
View Profile This has happened so many times for me, that I'm now in the habit of "CTRL+A" and "CTRL+C"-ing every 2-3 sentences. It's made my SP posting so much more risk-free. I now don't sit on the edge of my seat with a single drop of sweat dripping down my forehead before I hit the "post reply" button.
haha, same here. Sadly some Dawkins quote I had copied while writing turned up in my ctrl+v instead of the whole text.