Of course when Judge 1 goes through everyone's parts and rate them is highly respectable, thinking that doing all of that does take a very long time. But regarding the fact that Judge 1 isn't taking things into context and isn't referencing to other previous BSEs is something that will cause a major spark to a huge BSE rant like last time.
When someone introduces a new aspect for you to improve, that's a good thing. But you won't accept that, it's how good your punches, explosions and angles are you will accept. Never anything else. Aka you only want to play it safe, which is a sure sign of no improvement. You don't want to see something in a new light, because it reveals more weaknesses for you, which is somehow a bad thing. If you're only focusing on the past, doing anything new is pointless.
We should all know by now that we now what our weaknesses are and what we should've done better. But we would all know that judges can make major mistakes and take things to the wrong way.
So can you, as 90% of people here have done.
Rosie, many of us have came across the same thing and we all have seen the same post from Hewitt, stone, Camila, Jombo, CaM, etc. We all know. But the mistakes are there and Round 1 is what can determine the outcome. Of course BSE is a fun and educational experience in a way that can make us better through designated directions. But having something that interferes and ruins the point/core of BSE is what makes BSE not enjoyable. If you fix that certain aspect, BSE can turn into a hell of an amazing thing.
No, it's the fact you take BSE too seriously is what makes it not enjoyable, when people take their scores and other people's opinions way out of proportion is what ruins it. (Which is what I meant by "bloodsucking the fun out of the whole thing".) And besides, what's exactly "interfering and ruining the point/core of BSE?
If anyone still has some issue with what I'm saying, I'm more than welcome to take it into private discussion.