Please dont mind the titles lmao.
Underwater
http://fav.me/d7iz4ii
Sweet dreams[NSFW]:
Censored
http://fav.me/d7j7j5h
Uncensored
http://sta.sh/09565atshnf
CnC is appreciated :>
More art [NSFW]
Started by: JanRavnik | Replies: 4 | Views: 480
May 21, 2014 7:55 PM #1197789
May 21, 2014 11:58 PM #1197834
I'd question your decision to draw naughty bits, but that isn't my business. What i do want to know is if you had used reference.
For the first picture, the back of her hair looks like her skull had caved in. No eyebrows, and the angle for the facial features do not quite add up to each other. Outline of clothes do not follow the folds you've shaded in. Her right arm is disjointed, her right butt cheek should not be so visible at that perspective, and her limbs seem to have sunken into some deep void. Also typical but inaccurate animu face.
Did i mention she is five heads tall? She is five heads tall.
The second has more glaring mistakes because no clothes. Boobs are compressed when they should slide to the side, her waist had sunken in, two lines below the navel which i have no idea what they are, and a lack of a mound of venus. Hips are also drawn completely wrong, and the body doesn't have such flexibility that the legs could angle off to one side.
If you haven't already been using reference, now is the time to do so.
For the first picture, the back of her hair looks like her skull had caved in. No eyebrows, and the angle for the facial features do not quite add up to each other. Outline of clothes do not follow the folds you've shaded in. Her right arm is disjointed, her right butt cheek should not be so visible at that perspective, and her limbs seem to have sunken into some deep void. Also typical but inaccurate animu face.
Did i mention she is five heads tall? She is five heads tall.
The second has more glaring mistakes because no clothes. Boobs are compressed when they should slide to the side, her waist had sunken in, two lines below the navel which i have no idea what they are, and a lack of a mound of venus. Hips are also drawn completely wrong, and the body doesn't have such flexibility that the legs could angle off to one side.
If you haven't already been using reference, now is the time to do so.
May 22, 2014 12:33 PM #1197967
I had reference, but the way you said it, it would seem I did a bad job at using it.
Here[NSFW]:
http://sta.sh/029ail6v7vop
Thanks for the cnc :>
Here[NSFW]:
http://sta.sh/029ail6v7vop
Thanks for the cnc :>
May 22, 2014 6:28 PM #1198028
If you are blatantly copying the reference you will get nowhere.
If you have to, trace out the reference, finding and highlighting major bone landmarks and muscles, as well as their relation to each other. Once you have a clear idea make another sketch with the reference at the side.
Note that reference does not excuse lack of anatomical study. If you cannot view the body as even a simple form comprised of three dimensional objects then your drawings will continue to look flat and wrong.
If you have to, trace out the reference, finding and highlighting major bone landmarks and muscles, as well as their relation to each other. Once you have a clear idea make another sketch with the reference at the side.
Note that reference does not excuse lack of anatomical study. If you cannot view the body as even a simple form comprised of three dimensional objects then your drawings will continue to look flat and wrong.
May 22, 2014 7:39 PM #1198045
I don't just copy, dont worry.
When I use a reference, I try to understand why the limbs bend the way they do and how they would look from a different angle.
That's why I tend to change the position of the limbs. It's and advice I got from Sjt15.
I really want to understand it better, so just copying wouldn't get me anywhere.
When I use a reference, I try to understand why the limbs bend the way they do and how they would look from a different angle.
That's why I tend to change the position of the limbs. It's and advice I got from Sjt15.
I really want to understand it better, so just copying wouldn't get me anywhere.