I'm beginning to sense a pattern here.
Can we do something about defining to our users how infractions/bans work so we don't have to say "Infraction overload" but the real offense that led to it? It always just seems like someone will ask and the answer will be "infraction overload". Is that a good thing to say if all it ever tells us is that he did one tiny thing and he'll be back the next next day?
I always thought this thread was for bans that last more than a day. That's why it's stickied; it's like a bounty board for criminals at large. But for updating on even the litterbugs and busted tail-lighters is just ridiculous. It's tiring on the part of the mods, and it's really inane having to ask why all the time.
I dunno, I just feel like there's got to be another way to prevent redundancy in this thread.
Also unrelated, I asked earlier how BBKing knew Eclair Multi'd. And if my guess is right our posts were deleted because I knew something was up. BBKing, don't go around telling everyone private knowledge that has been entrusted to you. It might not even be correct and it's none of your business.
Bbking knew Eclair multi'd because Eclair posted on his clan wall that he got banned from infraction overload but he got only 2 infractions on a account called "EclairCat1"
Hey guys it's Eclair Idk why i get banned for 1 day
i just got 2 infraction this is dumb O_o'