SP Ban Registrar
Started by: Devour | Replies: 642 | Views: 148,598 | Sticky
Feb 25, 2015 5:30 PM #1315903
Why was RuDe banned?
Feb 25, 2015 5:35 PM #1315905
RuDe is banned for being infracted too many times.
Feb 25, 2015 5:39 PM #1315910
well, shit, why was mike9742 or whatever the fuck his name was banned?
Feb 25, 2015 5:40 PM #1315911
Day ban for infraction overload.
Feb 25, 2015 6:08 PM #1315926
Just a request: could you please update MarkXD status?
Since his ban has been way over
Since his ban has been way over
Feb 25, 2015 9:05 PM #1315970
how long is Setto Banned?
Feb 26, 2015 12:17 AM #1316015
Why is GeneralZ banned?
And there are too many people being banned this month lol
And there are too many people being banned this month lol
Feb 26, 2015 2:50 AM #1316067
I'm beginning to sense a pattern here.
Can we do something about defining to our users how infractions/bans work so we don't have to say "Infraction overload" but the real offense that led to it? It always just seems like someone will ask and the answer will be "infraction overload". Is that a good thing to say if all it ever tells us is that he did one tiny thing and he'll be back the next next day?
I always thought this thread was for bans that last more than a day. That's why it's stickied; it's like a bounty board for criminals at large. But for updating on even the litterbugs and busted tail-lighters is just ridiculous. It's tiring on the part of the mods, and it's really inane having to ask why all the time.
I dunno, I just feel like there's got to be another way to prevent redundancy in this thread.
Also unrelated, I asked earlier how BBKing knew Eclair Multi'd. And if my guess is right our posts were deleted because I knew something was up. BBKing, don't go around telling everyone private knowledge that has been entrusted to you. It might not even be correct and it's none of your business.
Can we do something about defining to our users how infractions/bans work so we don't have to say "Infraction overload" but the real offense that led to it? It always just seems like someone will ask and the answer will be "infraction overload". Is that a good thing to say if all it ever tells us is that he did one tiny thing and he'll be back the next next day?
I always thought this thread was for bans that last more than a day. That's why it's stickied; it's like a bounty board for criminals at large. But for updating on even the litterbugs and busted tail-lighters is just ridiculous. It's tiring on the part of the mods, and it's really inane having to ask why all the time.
I dunno, I just feel like there's got to be another way to prevent redundancy in this thread.
Also unrelated, I asked earlier how BBKing knew Eclair Multi'd. And if my guess is right our posts were deleted because I knew something was up. BBKing, don't go around telling everyone private knowledge that has been entrusted to you. It might not even be correct and it's none of your business.
Feb 26, 2015 2:58 AM #1316072
Quote from HewittI'm beginning to sense a pattern here.
Can we do something about defining to our users how infractions/bans work so we don't have to say "Infraction overload" but the real offense that led to it? It always just seems like someone will ask and the answer will be "infraction overload". Is that a good thing to say if all it ever tells us is that he did one tiny thing and he'll be back the next next day?
I always thought this thread was for bans that last more than a day. That's why it's stickied; it's like a bounty board for criminals at large. But for updating on even the litterbugs and busted tail-lighters is just ridiculous. It's tiring on the part of the mods, and it's really inane having to ask why all the time.
I dunno, I just feel like there's got to be another way to prevent redundancy in this thread.
Also unrelated, I asked earlier how BBKing knew Eclair Multi'd. And if my guess is right our posts were deleted because I knew something was up. BBKing, don't go around telling everyone private knowledge that has been entrusted to you. It might not even be correct and it's none of your business.
Bbking knew Eclair multi'd because Eclair posted on his clan wall that he got banned from infraction overload but he got only 2 infractions on a account called "EclairCat1"
Quote from EclairCat1Hey guys it's Eclair Idk why i get banned for 1 day
i just got 2 infraction this is dumb O_o'
Feb 26, 2015 3:00 AM #1316073
See here's the thing, whenever a user gets banned, the entire forum doesn't ask why. That's my point. Why he had to post that was confidential only to himself and the people in that clan. And you already knew so what's the point? If he was a mod informing someone who had asked then it wouldn't be an issue. But because he felt the need to publicly announce it is invasion of privacy.
Feb 27, 2015 4:25 AM #1316759
It's happened before, but those cases are rare because this site is so new (since the merge) that we've only had a handful of yearbans whom we break out
Feb 27, 2015 4:33 AM #1316763
Quote from hoangnguyetngaIt's happened before, but those cases are rare because this site is so new (since the merge) that we've only had a handful of yearbans whom we break out
How do you know? Hell, you're either a multi or you were lurking for a decade
Feb 27, 2015 3:37 PM #1317087
Quote from MiracleHow do you know? Hell, you're either a multi or you were lurking for a decade
The fuck? You are probably right unless this guy was on the old site during the merge...
Feb 28, 2015 7:40 PM #1317778
Why was Plyzex banned?
Feb 28, 2015 7:46 PM #1317783
He was banned for infraction overload due to a Minor Spam infraction.