That is a valid point, I mean, if you look at the first moon landing. Realizing that from their perspective every event in human life has happened within the biosphere, the earth they're now seeing from the moon until that very moment. Think about it as lighting up the events of human life at that point, the whole earth lit up like Las Vegas as the world man has scoured for a long long time. And then suddenly, one tiny blip outside of it.
That's totally fucking insane.
You're definitely right about how collosal it was that we can travel through space. We're definitely on the totem pole with our ape cousins and genetically we're only slightly different from them. But our scope of accomplishments massively overpower any other species.
Lets say all of mankind's accomplishments is put into Set {A} and all of the accomplishments of other apes are put into Set {B}. Now lets take all the accomplishments of Goldfish (who are regarded as being not too bright) are put into Set {C}. What would be interesting is to see whether the difference between {A} and {B} is similar to the difference between {B} and {C}. Or whether {A} just fucking towers over {B} in ways that even {B} does not tower over {C}.
Yeah, Exile's just salty, he in particular seems to hate Kanga-B the most, saying his posts are like YouTube comments. But that should be a good thing, YouTube comments often get lots of likes.
Thats a huge gap in context. In YouTube comments, there are GOOD comments that get a lot of likes and BAD comments that don't. But regardless of how GOOD a Youtube comment is, making one in a BBC panel would still make it a sub-par statement, even though in the context of YouTube comments they may work.
Well, I may be a bit moody here and there for a while. I apologize ahead of time if I lash at anyone, there is nothing aimed at anyone here.
Come at me, brah. Hows the business prep going?