MA15+... that is not standard. Does that translate to PG-13?

^ Anyone know what this guy is talking about?

I don't but. But yay! New video in my sub box

Oh sorry, didn't realize AUS had different classifications.

Blue, we have PG-13 here aswell I am pretty sure.


Wait, apparently we only have PG, and in Australia M is closer to PG-13 than PG.

Quote from Cronos

Oh sorry, didn't realize AUS had different classifications.

Blue, we have PG-13 here aswell I am pretty sure.

lol, most countries do. Like, Hong Kong runs off numbers.
Yeah, but U.S PG-13 is our M-15. Or maybe AUS classification board is more sensitive.

Well I really hope their PG-13 is our M. Would be much happier if the movie was labeled with a M rating.

Damn, there are tons of bots that appeared here. Probably because of the cool FA members joining.

Quote from Smile

Damn, there are tons of bots that appeared here. Probably because of the cool FA members joining.

Doesn't look like the admins are bothering to clear them up, but another issue may be that the forum reset probably reverted us to an old captcha which has been broken.

Oh, that's a more probable assumption than what my invisi-text say.

"Hey guys. Big annoucment here. I will be taking a break from StickPage for f-u-c-k knows how long but while im taking the break Captain Cook is in lead of TSPDUB."
-CMPunk



Does anyone wonder what happened to him?

Oh shit shit shit!
I saw you guys talking about the Hunger Games (They're so amazing), and I remembered something. Firefly was throwing out spoilers of the Hunger Games on this thread a while back, and I read what she said because it was unlikely I'd ever read these books. That was before I read the books, but I had forgotten what she said. Now that I remember, it totally would have ruined the books for me.

And I agree that the movie should really be very bloody and depressing. I was thinking that R would be the best rating for it. It's supposed to be gruesome, or else it doesn't have the full effect it was meant to have. In the first book, when Cato was dying, he was described as a "piece of raw meat". How is that going to work if this movie is PG-13?
And what the hell? You guys said it might be PG? If so, that is way fucked up. It would have to be completely different than the books.

And if this movie is messed up, I'm going to start a riot. And you will help me.

Quote from N T

Oh shit shit shit!
I saw you guys talking about the Hunger Games (They're so amazing), and I remembered something. Firefly was throwing out spoilers of the Hunger Games on this thread a while back, and I read what she said because it was unlikely I'd ever read these books. That was before I read the books, but I had forgotten what she said. Now that I remember, it totally would have ruined the books for me.

And I agree that the movie should really be very bloody and depressing. I was thinking that R would be the best rating for it. It's supposed to be gruesome, or else it doesn't have the full effect it was meant to have. In the first book, when Cato was dying, he was described as a "piece of raw meat". How is that going to work if this movie is PG-13?
And what the hell? You guys said it might be PG? If so, that is way fucked up. It would have to be completely different than the books.

And if this movie is messed up, I'm going to start a riot. And you will help me.

Not might be. It is. PG-13, 117 minutes. At least the length is kind of decent.

But yeah what you were talking about with Cato and everything, that should be R. The effect it could have had on people would have been amazing.

If you ask me, they could have made an R movie, and scored like a 9.0 on IMDb, or they could make it PG-13, score a 7.5 and make more money. Fuck you Gary Ross.