Alright, I'll just go ahead and bring it out. This is my other nomination for people who might attempt to argue against the Saint of Killers:

http://www.comicvine.com/rose-tattoo/4005-2200/

Rose Tattoo. The spirit of murder. She's not a god, but an anthropomorphic representation thereof. She's your standard enhanced-everything with a penchant for killing and no heart. But in addition, she can do extraordinary things like having sex with someone then injecting them with poisonous fluids in vitro to kill them, which is how she killed one of the more reality-warping personalities in her universe.

...can't brute force this one, huh? Just pound her with a hammer and hope she'll die? I mean, I could say 'strongest' in terms of raw strength. Unless of course, she too could become physically strong for the sake of killing.

Before Saitama, I was going to throw out wyrmspawn's Undefeated One; well now!

So if I chose Natsu, technically I would never lose or die?

Quote from GuardianTempest

...can't brute force this one, huh? Just pound her with a hammer and hope she'll die? I mean, I could say 'strongest' in terms of raw strength. Unless of course, she too could become physically strong for the sake of killing.

Before Saitama, I was going to throw out wyrmspawn's Undefeated One; well now!

She is strong. But theres one other thing you should know.

She takes over another body whenever she dies. She's the spirit of murder. One second she could be a hired killer, the other a kid in some household about to murder her father.

Spirits, can she be affected by supernatural stuff and Ghostbusters? Maybe she can be sealed into the netherworld forever or transferred to another world?
Yes, we're now talking countermeasures

sounds to me like she'd get taken out by sam and dean winchester by being stabbed by some kind of angels blood soaked elk horn or some shit.

So, I cast my vote for Id, from Greatest Fusion Fantasy Id.

http://idmanhwa.wikia.com/wiki/Id

By the 'Strongest' I meant taking into account all of these definition of strong and telling us who you think suits the best the title strongest. Who'll be able to defeat every other and survive life's tests. There arn't allowed any mythiological Gods like Hades, Zues Buddha..etc. You can represent demigods such as Thor ..etc; you can represent a God only if he is a 'God' in the manga,comic, fiction you read and not in any real religion. Goku is not a God, he was given this title because he was on pair with Gods.

Oi! Is gaming characters allowed?

Quote from Hewitt

Just so you guys know, This very same argument was made 2 years ago and the results are so far beyond AceDrake's comprehension, he just wouldn't be able to accept it.

I wanted to say this but I was afraid that it'd start things that I'd rather stay out of, soo...

Quote from Naimad

It's much simpler to just say 'he killed Superman'.

Well, he has taken down the whole Justice League with ease before, just because he killed superman does not mean that is his greatest feat. Because it's not.

Yes Ares, just added that. Gaming characters are allowed aswell.

Great, 'coz Asura's in.
http://asuraswrath.wikia.com/wiki/Asura

Quote from 420Ace Drake

By the 'Strongest' I meant taking into account all of these definition of strong and telling us who you think suits the best the title strongest. Who'll be able to defeat every other and survive life's tests. There arn't allowed any mythiological Gods like Hades, Zues Buddha..etc. You can represent demigods such as Thor ..etc; you can represent a God only if he is a 'God' in the manga,comic, fiction you read and not in any real religion. Goku is not a God, he was given this title because he was on pair with Gods.

Wait, so thor "THE GOD OF THUNDER" is a demi god, while the greek pantheon is comprised of real gods?
This must be insulting to someone.

And just to be clear if a character achieves power that surpasses a gods they're valid, but being born into said power isn't?

Wait, buddha isn't a mythological god. He's a very real person. That's like saying Jesus was a mythological god.
I can get scarecrow in here, if you'd like. He could educate you on this situation.

As far as I know they worship him as a God, that's why I thought that he is a God..If he is like Jesus then it's okay, even tho I really doubt that someone will choose Buddha or Jesus as their strongest character.. And as I said, it doesn't matter if he is Greek or other religion's God, Full Gods are not allowed. Demigods on the other hand are half other, so they're allowed.As far as I know Jord is Thor's mother and she is a giantess of uncultivated. primitive and unpopulated Earth. She is not a Goddess, which makes him a demigod. Twelve Olympians are the major deities of the Greek pantheon, commonly considered to be Zeus, Hera, Poseidon, Demeter, Athena, Apollo, Artemis, Ares, Aphrodite, Hephaestus, Hermes and either Hestia, or Dionysus.Hades and Persephone were sometimes included as part of the twelve Olympians. Some of them are born from Titans and other Gods, which make them Full Gods as far as I know. Like I said if their parents are a God/Titan and something else then they are demigods. I am pretty sure you all know what a demigod and a full god is, so let's stop this argument..

"And just to be clear if a character achieves power that surpasses a gods they're valid, but being born into said power isn't?" , never said that.

Quote from 420Ace Drake]so let's stop this argument..[/quote] Apparently we're arguing now, according to you. I was just asking you to clarify these major inconsistencies, which you didn't. So since we're arguing here, allow me to make a proper statement.

[QUOTE=420Ace Drake

As far as I know they worship him as a God, that's why I thought that he is a God..If he is like Jesus then it's okay, even tho I really doubt that someone will choose Buddha or Jesus as their strongest character..

Right? It would seem strange that anyone would choose Jesus or Buddha as their favorite in this contest which is why it seemed so odd that you even brought Buddha into this and why it was important for me to correct you. You seem to be pretty ignorant on the subject.

Quote from 420Ace Drake

And as I said, it doesn't matter if he is Greek or other religion's God, Full Gods are not allowed. Demigods on the other hand are half other, so they're allowed.As far as I know Jord is Thor's mother and she is a giantess of uncultivated. primitive and unpopulated Earth. She is not a Goddess, which makes him a demigod. Twelve Olympians are the major deities of the Greek pantheon, commonly considered to be Zeus, Hera, Poseidon, Demeter, Athena, Apollo, Artemis, Ares, Aphrodite, Hephaestus, Hermes and either Hestia, or Dionysus.Hades and Persephone were sometimes included as part of the twelve Olympians. Some of them are born from Titans and other Gods, which make them Full Gods as far as I know. Like I said if their parents are a God/Titan and something else then they are demigods. I am pretty sure you all know what a demigod and a full god is, so let's stop this argument..

By Jord do you mean Jörð? The Norse goddess of earth? A few articles I searched up on google said she is the mother of Thor. I think you're incorrect and that Thor being one of the Aesir or "principle gods" in that pantheon among the ranks of Balder, Odin and others is not to be counted by your definition of demi-god. Thor "the god of thunder" is clearly a god which was heavily worshiped in Germany. Meaning he should not be valid in this contest.
I should also bring to your attention the arbitrary double standard of counting titans as valid parents for the creation of gods, but not ancient giants.

Quote from 420Ace Drake

"And just to be clear if a character achieves power that surpasses a gods they're valid, but being born into said power isn't?" , never said that.

I'm not saying you said that, I'm asking what you mean. If attaining a certain level of power that is on par with gods is okay but literally being a god isn't, then we need to discuss at what point one ascends to godhood. Otherwise narrowing down the list of candidates in this way is meaningless. What's the point? And if we do establish at what point something is considered a god, then we're just setting a benchmark and asking who falls the shortest of godliness. Not who the strongest is.

My point is, this discussion is inherently flawed and you're the reason.