List of Fictional Organizations (wRHG resource)

Started by: RichardLongflop | Replies: 99 | Views: 37,726 | Sticky

roBEAT
2

Posts: 107
Joined: Jul 2015
Rep: 10

View Profile
Nov 21, 2015 1:26 AM #1417379
I don't think self-administered justice and support by the government (which seems to be kinda corrupt based on the other organizations) fit together at all. In my opinion the initial version was better and there's no need for them to be police-ish.
Urako

Posts: 636
Joined: Mar 2014
Rep: 10

View Profile
Nov 21, 2015 1:43 AM #1417385
I edited it back to what it was. Richard wanted it to be government supported, but I found too many problems and conflicts on top of what RoBeat says, if half the wRHG's backstories are to go by (And they are), the government is responsible for half the suffering Providence is trying to prevent.

Quote from roBEAT
I don't think self-administered justice and support by the government (which seems to be kinda corrupt based on the other organizations) fit together at all. In my opinion the initial version was better and there's no need for them to be police-ish.


They're not the law, nor do they claim to be. Their just an organization that tries to help.
RichardLongflop
2

Posts: 1,265
Joined: Oct 2012
Rep: 10

View Profile
Nov 21, 2015 1:54 AM #1417386
Well if you've got it the way you want it, and you feel like it'll fit in as a resource, I'll add it. So, you good with it?
Urako

Posts: 636
Joined: Mar 2014
Rep: 10

View Profile
Nov 21, 2015 3:20 AM #1417399
Quote from RichardLongflop
Well if you've got it the way you want it, and you feel like it'll fit in as a resource, I'll add it. So, you good with it?


Yeah. You can add it.

As a side note, why do you feel it won't fit as a resource?
RichardLongflop
2

Posts: 1,265
Joined: Oct 2012
Rep: 10

View Profile
Nov 21, 2015 12:40 PM #1417477
I didn't say that. It's your organisation, it's up to you to shape it into something that could fit in snugly. If you think that it is, I'll add it.
Urako

Posts: 636
Joined: Mar 2014
Rep: 10

View Profile
Nov 21, 2015 7:28 PM #1417526
Yes, I think it fits.
The Organization
2

Posts: 3,475
Joined: Jun 2013
Rep: 10

View Profile
Nov 23, 2015 5:04 PM #1417970
Quote from RichardLongflop
Surely the name isn't relevant when it comes to how discreet and obscure they are? That's a matter of how many people know of it, rather than what they know it as.

I'll just put down "The Eighty" then.

Also now we have two versions of The Organization. Vern's one, and your "The Organization (Original)" one. Mate, this list was made so we won't have overlapping organisations, so we can keep some sort of canon going in our universes. Hopefully I can have Vern change the name of his, but even so, I think you need to get better with organisation names.

If I were to hae a car, I'd call it "my car." If I were to own a house, I'd call it "my house." But those would be personally owned objects, not a goddamn agency. I don't really like the idea of cliche names because this universe caters to many individuals that use it.

A place called "The Organization" might work if it were a standalone story or series, namely a TV series or a feature films, but this list is meant to be used by multiple writers. Surely you can be a bit more original than that, folks? And that doesn't go just for you, Org.

After much thought Flop, I don't think that reasoning is good enough.
You're essentially saying because you don't think the name I have given my organization constitutes a real name. I'm sorry, but just because you made the thread doesn't give you the authority to overwrite another's creative decisions. In a sense that invalidates the purpose of this entire thread. Just because you think its "too common" to be a name has no bearing on the name that I want for it, it isn't really your decision to make.
Originally, I compromised because of Vern's "Organization" despite the obvious fact that I actually started the practice, since I thought arguing over it would be juvenile, but I'm taking issue with this because its blatantly ignoring my own opinion for your own on a matter where your opinion is completely irrelevant.

So, You can either fix the name i.e. "The Eighty" -> "80" or you can remove the entry of my organization from your list. The purpose of submitting it to your "unofficial" list was because I was under the impression that this would be a resources for other writers, but as it stands it benefits no one, save for your Ego perhaps, to have it listed by the wrong name. Worse yet, if other writers end up referring to it by a wrong name, then that only serves to create more confusion.
Haru
2

Posts: 1,138
Joined: Feb 2015
Rep: 10

View Profile
Nov 23, 2015 5:40 PM #1417974
Quote from The Organization
After much thought Flop, I don't think that reasoning is good enough.
You're essentially saying because you don't think the name I have given my organization constitutes a real name. I'm sorry, but just because you made the thread doesn't give you the authority to overwrite another's creative decisions. In a sense that invalidates the purpose of this entire thread. Just because you think its "too common" to be a name has no bearing on the name that I want for it, it isn't really your decision to make.
Originally, I compromised because of Vern's "Organization" despite the obvious fact that I actually started the practice, since I thought arguing over it would be juvenile, but I'm taking issue with this because its blatantly ignoring my own opinion for your own on a matter where your opinion is completely irrelevant.

So, You can either fix the name i.e. "The Eighty" -> "80" or you can remove the entry of my organization from your list. The purpose of submitting it to your "unofficial" list was because I was under the impression that this would be a resources for other writers, but as it stands it benefits no one, save for your Ego perhaps, to have it listed by the wrong name. Worse yet, if other writers end up referring to it by a wrong name, then that only serves to create more confusion.


Coming back from the grave to say that you sound really salty. Honestly, I think Richard's statement wasn't that harsh.
It's like Hewitt vs Tsar Bomba again. Anyway, back to the dead I go, but the statement was more extra salty than extra bold.
Maybe you can present it like a calm man and not bold random statements, and just ask Richard to remove it?
But your choice bro, don't blame me for a harsh rebuttal by Richard coming on the train.
RichardLongflop
2

Posts: 1,265
Joined: Oct 2012
Rep: 10

View Profile
Nov 23, 2015 6:23 PM #1417976
I feel like I did get a bit too personal about all this. I figure I should just be unbiased about this stuff in future. I'll fix stuff up. But still, I stick to my suggestions.

To make it concise, I dislike "The Organization" because it's making it sound like it's THE Organization, in a list of organizations. I don't like it sounding like the big best one atop them all, so that's my viewpoint. (Also, if there's no 'The Organization', then neither you nor Vern would be winners and it'd be equality.)

And about 80. It doesn't really feel namey to me. It's a number. I wouldn't name my son 27 or my dog 13. Numbers just don't seem to fit anywhere name-wise. Sure, it's subtle by itself, though it'd only be noticed in speech if a person said it with great emphasis (since it's such a casual thing.) If I wanted to make a secret, subtle organization, I'd give it initials instead. If one were to know the company, they'd understood what each initial meant, and you could hide the initials easily enough. Like what the SCP Foundation does.
The Organization
2

Posts: 3,475
Joined: Jun 2013
Rep: 10

View Profile
Nov 23, 2015 7:39 PM #1417990
Quote from RichardLongflop
I feel like I did get a bit too personal about all this. I figure I should just be unbiased about this stuff in future. I'll fix stuff up. But still, I stick to my suggestions.

To make it concise, I dislike "The Organization" because it's making it sound like it's THE Organization, in a list of organizations. I don't like it sounding like the big best one atop them all, so that's my viewpoint. (Also, if there's no 'The Organization', then neither you nor Vern would be winners and it'd be equality.)

And about 80. It doesn't really feel namey to me. It's a number. I wouldn't name my son 27 or my dog 13. Numbers just don't seem to fit anywhere name-wise. Sure, it's subtle by itself, though it'd only be noticed in speech if a person said it with great emphasis (since it's such a casual thing.) If I wanted to make a secret, subtle organization, I'd give it initials instead. If one were to know the company, they'd understood what each initial meant, and you could hide the initials easily enough. Like what the SCP Foundation does.


Well how about "Le" Organisation, (The Organization refers to that of the same name in the series Kingdom Hearts)

As for the number thing, its all about context.
The name was partially inspired by Zamyatin's We, a book I recently read for a class, there the main character's name is D-503.

I appreciate the resolution(For lack of a better word)
Malacal
2

Posts: 418
Joined: Jul 2013
Rep: 10

View Profile
Nov 27, 2015 5:32 AM #1418749
Quote from RichardLongflop
"80" as a name? Well, since there already IS a "The Organization" courtesy of Vern (his came first, sorry. I just figured people would have actual names for their things, rather than just flat-out stating what they were) your thing will have to be a branch of his. Why not give it a name that sounds like a, well, name?


Ehhhh. I don't think Vern has the right to his being the original. Remember when I made that awkward little comment about how he was already using an existing Organization? That's because I thought his organization was a reference to The Organization used by the then-inactive user The Organization. Then Vern was like "lol no I just shitted it out."
Notice, this creation myth puts The Org's The Org (this is annoyingly repetitive...) before Vern's The Org. So, if someone should conform it's Vern. Or Maybe they could collaborate as both are defined very little and if the Org plans on making a clan, and with Vern's plans it could end in a clan war (HINT, HINT, HINT.)

But, this thread was born around the fate that millions of organizations would be brought forth. They would either be mostly rejected, or all accepted into a giant clusterfuck of government.
RichardLongflop
2

Posts: 1,265
Joined: Oct 2012
Rep: 10

View Profile
Nov 27, 2015 7:42 PM #1418904
Collaboration is indeed better than conflict. Vern, Org, kiss and make love up. Collaborate.

But then again, people can be stubborn about their canons. I know I would be. Bleghghh.
Malacal
2

Posts: 418
Joined: Jul 2013
Rep: 10

View Profile
Nov 28, 2015 3:44 AM #1418973
Right, we should pester him...
I'm sure though that they could make it easily work. But... hey The Org, do you have skype? If you do then I'll be your wingman to Vern.
Chromium7

Posts: 686
Joined: Nov 2012
Rep: 10

View Profile
Dec 23, 2015 8:20 AM #1424944
So I had some time on my hands after I decided not to go to sleep tonight for some reason.

It became apparent that listing Nexcorp's relations to other organizations in my canon might be helpful in my neverending quest to add continuity to the Battle of Genre.

I figured you all might enjoy having this:

Nexcorp's ties to other organizations (Click to Show)


(And yes Richard, I'm reading the thing you sent me please calm down)

Also why isn't this stickied, I feel like this should be stickied. Someone should go talk to acutelatios.

Say... I'm a someone. R-right?

Love you guise~
acutelatios
Moderator
2

Posts: 1,009
Joined: Feb 2012
Rep: 10

View Profile
Dec 23, 2015 8:39 AM #1424945
I've been asked to sticky this, but honestly I should've done this a while ago. This is a good reference for anyone who needs this info. Best to put it at the top~

o w o