Update:

Lamitrov - Boomerang, YWJ, Nish, Zero

Quote from Youwishjellyfish

I'm making a joke about you backing off everything and saying "I'll wait for Exile to shed some light on us/makes a decision" lol.

Not sure what to say about this but I've been pretty active in discussions and that it's only in voting that I was reluctant because I wanted Exile to give at least information. I don't get why you have to put in "everything" and put me in a bad light.

And yeah, it's a pretty weak reason seeing as Lami was contributing D1 (though not really effectively lol) and has only being MIA during D2. I mean I'm not taking my vote off him or anything, I just want everyone to be aware of the double standard.

I don't get it?

Both of them are in the same spot right now and voting either one of them at this point won't change anything because they just aren't giving off anything. The only difference is that Lamitrov responded but did not meet up with the expectations he gave to us while Squidd hasn't said anything yet. Who knows, maybe something happened to Squidd in real life that was just out of his control is what I'm saying. Lamitrov had his chance and he blew it while Squidd still has it, regardless of what little chance he even has to redeem himself.

Lami and Squidd have been trying to contribute [I've read their posts since D1 until now again]. Lami has tried to help as YWJ said and Squidd has asked a few game mechanic questions. Since they're in the same bind shouldn't we be able to choose by roles they have?

Which boils down to: Lynching IronMan or Hawkeye.

I say IronMan since Hawkeye's ability is more useful in the end game.

#vote Lamitrov

Quote from Zero

Not sure what to say about this but I've been pretty active in discussions and that it's only in voting that I was reluctant because I wanted Exile to give at least information. I don't get why you have to put in "everything" and put me in a bad light.

Oh stop getting defensive lol, the whole point of me voting for Squidd was to rustle some feathers, this is just an extension of that.

I don't get it?

Both of them are in the same spot right now and voting either one of them at this point won't change anything because they just aren't giving off anything. The only difference is that Lamitrov responded but did not meet up with the expectations he gave to us while Squidd hasn't said anything yet. Who knows, maybe something happened to Squidd in real life that was just out of his control is what I'm saying. Lamitrov had his chance and he blew it while Squidd still has it, regardless of what little chance he even has to redeem himself.

But Squidd has said something, his whole he defended himself by pretty much shrugging and saying he didn't know how to play, and then you patted him on the back and gave him some tips. Me and Boomerang put the same pressure on Lami and all of a sudden he isn't meeting your expectations. You even gave an excuse for Squidd while condemning Lami for the exact same excuse.

Now I'm putting you in a bad light lol.

Quote from Youwishjellyfish

Oh stop getting defensive lol, the whole point of me voting for Squidd was to rustle some feathers, this is just an extension of that.

Alright then.

But Squidd has said something, his whole he defended himself by pretty much shrugging and saying he didn't know how to play, and then you patted him on the back and gave him some tips. Me and Boomerang put the same pressure on Lami and all of a sudden he isn't meeting your expectations. You even gave an excuse for Squidd while condemning Lami for the exact same excuse.

Now I'm putting you in a bad light lol.

Okay, let me make myself clear because it just seems you're not getting it.

(1) Lamitrov said he will explain it the next day
(2) The next day, he hasn't explained it and was called out on it
(3) He posted but it was not sufficient, thus, a vote was casted on him

Also, it was the first time I gave advice to anyone in the whole game because he seemed to be like me back then in playing Mafia(Passive and afraid to say something). I don't need to say the same thing to Lamitrov because I already posted it and he already read it. I called him out because HE didn't meet HIS expectations. He said "tomorrow" but posted sometime near the day after tomorrow.

I check in often this thread, but it's really hard to correlate.

as to what error said, I can't make use of my abilities until casualties roll in
and since the ability is one time, i have to rely on Exile or somebody trustworthy on which player i should take place and make advantage of his abilities

Quote from Zero

Alright then.



Okay, let me make myself clear because it just seems you're not getting it.

(1) Lamitrov said he will explain it the next day
(2) The next day, he hasn't explained it and was called out on it
(3) He posted but it was not sufficient, thus, a vote was casted on him

Also, it was the first time I gave advice to anyone in the whole game because he seemed to be like me back then in playing Mafia(Passive and afraid to say something). I don't need to say the same thing to Lamitrov because I already posted it and he already read it. I called him out because HE didn't meet HIS expectations. He said "tomorrow" but posted sometime near the day after tomorrow.

His post wasn't sufficient? (I actually agree with you on this one lol) But just above you gave an excuse that you didn't vote for Squidd because

Who knows, maybe something happened to Squidd in real life that was just out of his control is what I'm saying.

And when Lami uses that exact excuse it's all of a sudden "not sufficient"?

I'll be very clear that I think Squidd, Lami and devi equally need to go because of comments like "this thread is hard to correlate", "I have exams", "I don't know how to play" etc. Generally, I think that sort of stuff is ok because Mafia is a tough game and its perfectly fine to not know what to do, and I sympathize with all their personal situations, but when we have no choice but to lynch random players and hope for some revelations, those are the first people who need to go. I voted Lami solely because (as I mentioned before) there were already votes against him and I want this game to progress.

Quote from Youwishjellyfish

And when Lami uses that exact excuse it's all of a sudden "not sufficient"?

The thing is, Squidd hasn't said WHAT happened to him while Lamitrov did(Although, he just posted right now so I guess I already know nothing happened). How can you expect me to know what Squidd was going through? I give the benefit of the doubt in these things man. It's not like I don't want to vote for Squidd, it's just that Lamitrov is giving me a bigger and concrete reason than in Squidd's area. I did tell you I'll vote for Squidd, just that I wanted to wait for Exile for just a bit longer(We have the time to not be rash) for some information.

Quote from Youwishjellyfish

So the vaguer we are in our defense and the more likely we are to get the benefit of the doubt? I'll keep that in mind lol.

Woah there, I never said anything like that.

Squidd didn't post for a long time, that's why you voted him initially right? I was hesitant to vote him because something might have happened to him in real life, so I gave him the benefit of the doubt.

See why did you need to wait for Exile for one but not the other?

Because Lamitrov already gave me enough a reason to vote him off and that is him not meeting his and our expectations as a player. Why do you have to think that everything I do has to be objective based? I understood that someone has to be voted off for the game to progress and it was a matter of Squidd and Lami, that of which, Lami just gave me enough of a reason to vote him off.

Why are you so scared and concerned about this? I can always unvote Lamitrov when Exile decides to post some information that may lead us to unvoting him but for now, we need the game to move and Lamitrov just convinces me more than Squidd does. You wanted votes right? I voted and gave my reasoning. So what's your problem? If anything, you're just picking out the little things over and over again because I'm just saying the same things over and over again.

I am more convinced to vote off Lamitrov than Squidd and that I understand votes are needed for the game to progress, thus, I voted.

Can someone tell Squidd to atleast fucking vote for Lami? Did he just post and completely ignore the fact that we're voting?

Alright ladies, relax. The Day is over:

Final Results:

Lamitrov - Boomerang, YWJ, Nish, Zero

Night 2

- PM me your actions as listed in your ability. Refer to frontpage for info on your ability.

- Even if you are not making an Action or if you dont have a target, please put it in your PM title.

- Please put the action IN YOU PM TITLES to avoid confusion on my part. If you wish to ask something to me too, put a "Read Inside" on the title.

- Deadline for Night 2 is Dec 2, 2015

- For the Skrulls, all 3 of you do not need to PM me the same thing. Have a representative state who will do the Killing Action and who will do something else. Remember that the Killer cannot use his Role Ability as well.

- If you do not wish to use your ability, you must still PM me "No Action" so that I'll know.


Good Luck!



By the way guys, I'd like to make an extra announcement. It seems I never put up a rule talking about voluntary inactivity. Lamitrov should have approached me instead of just dragging the game for everyone else. So effective tonight, Devour will replace him. I am not looking to replace devi and Squidd as they are just being inactive to a fault that they cannot contribute. But if they wish to quit this game, they know where to ask.

Quote from Zero

Woah there, I never said anything like that.

Squidd didn't post for a long time, that's why you voted him initially right? I was hesitant to vote him because something might have happened to him in real life, so I gave him the benefit of the doubt.

You said you gave him the benefit of the doubt because he didn't explain EXACTLY what happened to him, he was vague, you let it slide. Lami wasn't, you voted for him.
And no, I started with Squidd not because of his current inactivity but because he said nothing of worth during D1 AND was inactive.

Because Lamitrov already gave me enough a reason to vote him off and that is him not meeting his and our expectations as a player. Why do you have to think that everything I do has to be objective based? I understood that someone has to be voted off for the game to progress and it was a matter of Squidd and Lami, that of which, Lami just gave me enough of a reason to vote him off.

Why are you so scared and concerned about this? I can always unvote Lamitrov when Exile decides to post some information that may lead us to unvoting him but for now, we need the game to move and Lamitrov just convinces me more than Squidd does. You wanted votes right? I voted and gave my reasoning. So what's your problem? If anything, you're just picking out the little things over and over again because I'm just saying the same things over and over again.

I am more convinced to vote off Lamitrov than Squidd and that I understand votes are needed for the game to progress, thus, I voted.

I assumed everything you did was objective based because you threw numbers and odds at everyone during D1 lol.

Scared? Hahaha, I've seen someone give a piss poor excuse not to vote for someone, and then vote for someone else who was in the exact same boat as the first person. This isn't being scared or concerned but curious as to why there was a double standard. Again, I actually didn't want votes, I wanted reactions, I wanted this because this is how you expose people so they can be investigated.


NINJA'd....

Quote from Youwishjellyfish

You said you gave him the benefit of the doubt because he didn't explain EXACTLY what happened to him, he was vague, you let it slide. Lami wasn't, you voted for him.

And why is that wrong?

I assumed everything you did was objective based because you threw numbers and odds at everyone during D1 lol.

Alright, that's understandable. Although, I hope this argument of ours should at least let you know that I'm not all about that yeah?

Scared? Hahaha, I've seen someone give a piss poor excuse not to vote for someone, and then vote for someone else who was in the exact same boat as the first person. This isn't being scared or concerned but curious as to why there was a double standard. Again, I actually didn't want votes, I wanted reactions, I wanted this because this is how you expose people so they can be investigated.

"Piss poor excuse" is what you say but it's really all there is to it. Squidd hasn't said about his current situation while Lami did and that tipped me to giving off the final vote to him. You're making such a simple thing so complicated to apparently "investigate" me.

Ah, it's nighttime. We'll continue this argument the next day if you still want to investigate me more.