It would be convenient if I was a skrull, I won't lie.
Except I'm not a skrull.
I think Error was lying, and he knows it. Error was Loki, and I don't think Loki would risk dying by actually using his Coulson ability when he could just lie. I think Loki would actually benefit from telling the town that a Skrull is a confirmed innocent. Meanwhile, Devi has everything to gain by being unnoticed because it allows him to make kill moves without being tracked by Mantha or stunned by Jellyfish. It also follows the tried and true strategy of just... doing nothing. It works almost every time.
This brings me to my second point. As you guys might have noticed, the Skrull have not failed a single kill move all game long. This is why I think Envoy is the second Skrull, using his invisible woman's shield to protect the kill actions of Devi and guaranteeing their success. He has also been extremely inactive, but not quite as much as Devi has been.
So automatically inactivity means I'm going around murdering people? Yeah sure, we'll go with that. With that logic we can move to anyone else who's been inactive, but lets take a notice shall we? Every. Single. Person. Who has been inactive and lynched for it (Among other reasons) has been an avenger. Doesn't that really say something about the people accusing them?
But now, lets move away from psychological, and lets look at physical evidence. When we had the conversation on Skype, back when we still did it without realizing that it probably wasn't very good, Mantha had raised the point of it being Raptor. Since at the time, Mantha was raising valid points about lynching Raptor instead of killing off Apex, and I believed her. When Raptor died and showed he was an avenger, I got suspicious that Mrs. Man-hour was manipulating us into killing avengers, since I thought she wanted to move it from Apex who was possibly a skrull to a avenger. This of course was proved wrong when she and Apex was shown to be avengers, but to get to my point. All the people in that chat has been killed, Boomerang, Apex and Mantha. Except two people, me and devour.
Now this is probably painting a target on both of us, I'd rather have that. I have no physical evidence that I'm an avenger, and I will admit I have been bandwagoning. But so has devour. and now when he has one final target that knew of the plans in that chat, he needs to tie up those lose ends and get rid of me. No one would have batted an eye at it because of my inactivity and we will have lost another avenger, making us lose the game. I say that devour is a skrull.
But sure, kill me, and we'll lose the game to the skrull, not my problem.
Devi - Devi was contributing D1, fell off the face of the Earth D2, only really popped his head out D3 when he got called out for something, that PM doesn't make me want to lynch him, but I also think it doesn't confirm him seeing as Loki was Coulson, D4 he only posted three times (but so did I, it was a short Day lol) 2 post to defend himself and 1 to vote for Apex, so despite his inactivity he's been there for every lynch (then again, so have I lol). I just can't work out why someone who was kinda confirmed townie would play so defensively, they should be one of the most active players trying to set traps and pointing fingers at people because they can do that without other players thinking they're a Skrull who's just leading a blind town. I don't feel comfortable voting on this, but it's just not behavior I'd expect from a townie.
I wasn't posting during the Raptor lynching because we were discussing on Skype. At the time I thought I'd just be repeating what everyone else would be saying, so I thought I'd avoid it. I did the same with Apex, as we had already discussed why we should kill him.
On the topic of being defensive, sure I'm defensive, I have to be. I have a cryo pod standing right by me staring hungrily at my silence.
Nish - Nish is a smart guy, and excels at these forum games, so no matter how well he played I don't think I would ever fully trust him lol. But during Day 1 and 2 he was playing very neutral, everything he did was backed with the fact that he would follow Exile no matter what, which is a very pro-town move. D3 he stepped up his game and started calling out people and getting his hands dirty looking for Skrull. D4 was more of the same, but he stepped up his game yet again, I won't say he strong armed the town because he didn't but it was the first time I'd say he was being aggressive in his Skrull hunt, he also backed of Mantha from his "if Raptor is Town you have to tell us everything" to more of a "yeah I can understand her reasoning, she must be good", I was in the same boat as him, so this could be nothing or it could be that he knew she was going to be the N4 target so moved onto killing Apex the doctor or Devour someone he couldn't kill at night. I want to be clear that I think this is a long shot. But I also can't shake the feeling that he's smart enough to pull it off.
This is one of the things I feel like we should talk about. Every step, Nish has followed the bandwagon that led to the death of an avenger. He didn't even really try to argue against it, saying that he'll investigate if its wrong but doesn't really live up to it. Honestly, I don't have any physical evidence of Nish playing as a Skrull and trying to kill us off, but he's smart enough to play a game where people believe him to be a avenger.