Sorry Devi, but your argument is super flimsy. Here's why:
So automatically inactivity means I'm going around murdering people? Yeah sure, we'll go with that. With that logic we can move to anyone else who's been inactive, but lets take a notice shall we? Every. Single. Person. Who has been inactive and lynched for it (Among other reasons) has been an avenger. Doesn't that really say something about the people accusing them?
I'm not suspicious of you
only because of inactivity. It's the fact that Error "confirmed" that you were an Avenger and yet you did nothing with it. Everyone else who you listed wasn't lynched for their inactivity--they were lynched because of how they reacted when put under pressure. One difference is that they tried to explain how they weren't actually Skrull. You're just deflecting blame onto others. You're even willing to paint a target on yourself so that you can try and blame me a little more. Why would someone want senseless lynching unless they're a Skrull themselves?
Voting someone we think is a Skrull who turns out to be an Avenger is not a cause of suspect. Deliberation was put into each vote and there's always going to be mistakes. It's just that now I feel like there's enough information to show that you really have to be a Skrull based on your behavior.
But now, lets move away from psychological, and lets look at physical evidence. When we had the conversation on Skype, back when we still did it without realizing that it probably wasn't very good, Mantha had raised the point of it being Raptor. Since at the time, Mantha was raising valid points about lynching Raptor instead of killing off Apex, and I believed her. When Raptor died and showed he was an avenger, I got suspicious that Mrs. Man-hour was manipulating us into killing avengers, since I thought she wanted to move it from Apex who was possibly a skrull to a avenger. This of course was proved wrong when she and Apex was shown to be avengers, but to get to my point. All the people in that chat has been killed, Boomerang, Apex and Mantha. Except two people, me and devour.
Now this is probably painting a target on both of us, I'd rather have that. I have no physical evidence that I'm an avenger, and I will admit I have been bandwagoning. But so has devour. and now when he has one final target that knew of the plans in that chat, he needs to tie up those lose ends and get rid of me. No one would have batted an eye at it because of my inactivity and we will have lost another avenger, making us lose the game. I say that devour is a skrull.
Outside of being totally fine with painting a target on yourself... What point is this making? Most of this section of post was, "Well I can't refute anything and I can't say I'm not Skrull, but..."
Also, how would a Skrull benefit from arbitrarily killing people who had been in the Skype chat? If anything, doing that would make them more suspicious because someone from there saw Boomy announce he was going to use his Scry ability, and he died that very night. The thing is, me and Mantha immediately told Boomy to not announce that stuff and that Skype was a bad idea. Not you, though.
The thing is, I've been for the town since the very start and I've shown it through my actions. That's how I can say that I'm not a Skrull, and it's how I can back it up. The town can still win this and this isn't over like you want us to think. We're late enough in the game now to have serious proof behind our accusations besides just grasping at straws and already-explained suspicions. We can totally do this, guys.
Yeah, Exile bro. We've given you 5 days to gather intel and lot of people have been weeded out. We need you to make the decisions now. Based on all the info, especially the stuff unavailable to us, I suggest the most simple strategy: Exile picks out the Mafia, and we'll vote what he says.
This is the 666th post. A bad omen if I've ever seen one :p But I agree with this.
