Break the Game (A game)

Started by: Devour | Replies: 358 | Views: 24,962

Skeletonxf
2

Posts: 2,706
Joined: Aug 2013
Rep: 10

View Profile
Oct 4, 2016 5:47 PM #1463286
You're right. However I don't like relying on chance. More importantly there's more than 2 people gaining loads of damage or otherwise powerful effects for me to pick a single person to target.
GMR
2

Posts: 3,411
Joined: Aug 2012
Rep: 10

View Profile
Oct 4, 2016 6:10 PM #1463288
Therefore, your logic is to let them get even more powerful, instead of eliminating a bigger threat and then trying to win? My power could literally help take down a big target and allow you to claim victory. Yet, "[You] don't like relying on chance", so you're not even gonna try n' win? Don't waste your vote.
Skeletonxf
2

Posts: 2,706
Joined: Aug 2013
Rep: 10

View Profile
Oct 4, 2016 6:33 PM #1463296
I've already lost. At this point I could only win if I got insanely lucky with not getting targeted by disco ball from everyone else. I'd like to keep that (1/6)^10 chance as good as possible and introducing a second target per round is not good odds for me.

Who would you even say I should veto instead then?
WyzDM
2

Posts: 2,265
Joined: Jan 2013
Rep: 10

View Profile
Oct 4, 2016 6:41 PM #1463298
Yeha what's up with people trying to change the nature of everyone attacking everyone and then allowing more people to spin that into something that's not as random. No thanks.

Exile my power isn't 2 in one now as devour mentioned but it's cool

#Veto GMR
Exile
Administrator
2

Posts: 8,404
Joined: Dec 2005
Rep: 10

View Profile
Oct 4, 2016 6:59 PM #1463301
changing my vote. #veto hewitt

not to pick on him but seriously, 100 base damage from the beginning when we only have 600 HP is absurd and will end this game very quickly. I'd urge you guys to veto it
Skeletonxf
2

Posts: 2,706
Joined: Aug 2013
Rep: 10

View Profile
Oct 4, 2016 7:50 PM #1463305
That is actually a pretty good point

#veto Hewitt
Devour
Administrator
1

Posts: 9,916
Joined: Apr 2008
Rep: 10

View Profile
Oct 5, 2016 1:59 AM #1463322
Skeleton: #Veto Hewitt
Exile: #Veto Hewitt
Wyzdm: #Veto GMR
Firewall: #Veto GMR

We are only missing Hewitt and GMR's votes before we're ready to see the winner once and for all.
Hewitt

Posts: 14,256
Joined: Jul 2012
Rep: 10

View Profile
Oct 5, 2016 2:30 AM #1463331
Exile is talking out of his ass. If we don't veto GMR, and with my Disco Ball AND the fact that my gunman doesn't trigger until later, it'll be very hard to hit someone with it. It doesn't even fucking matter if you let it happen because by then we'd all be significantly reduced because I will have to be meatshielded to even fight at all. I could easily be dead in one turn as anyone else.

And don't preach to me about OP attack values, every single round has had someone in this group boost their attack percentages. Some more than others. What I offer is a base hit, with a chance to inflict something and deal no damage. It's not as lethal as you would like it to have.

But there's no point in convincing you or Skele, is there? From day 1, I've been 'suspicious' in your eyes and there's been a mindset that I'm poised to win this. Of course you'll have it out for me.



Firewall, I'm all for veto-ing GMR, but his death will not help you and your abilities. If anything as GMR has said, redirection saves you just as much as it saves us all. Let's veto Wyz instead. He's been gaining nothing but offensives since the start of the game, as an antithesis to my defensiveness.

GMR, Our abilities play off each other. I don't want to have to be pit against each other only for both our powers to get veto'd. Let's rally against Wyz and end this properly.

#veto Wyz
GMR
2

Posts: 3,411
Joined: Aug 2012
Rep: 10

View Profile
Oct 5, 2016 3:10 AM #1463335
#Veto Wyz

His loss is our gain, people.
Devour
Administrator
1

Posts: 9,916
Joined: Apr 2008
Rep: 10

View Profile
Oct 5, 2016 3:18 AM #1463338
Skeleton: #Veto Hewitt
Exile: #Veto Hewitt
Wyzdm: #Veto GMR
Firewall: #Veto GMR
Hewitt: #Vote Wyz
GMR: #Vote Wyz

The current lineup........................................................................................
I'll hold on a bit longer in case anyone wants to give someone a final 3rd vote lmao
Hewitt

Posts: 14,256
Joined: Jul 2012
Rep: 10

View Profile
Oct 5, 2016 3:38 AM #1463339
Please hold on, jeezus. You never mentioned voting had deadlines.

I'm PM-ing people
WyzDM
2

Posts: 2,265
Joined: Jan 2013
Rep: 10

View Profile
Oct 5, 2016 6:05 AM #1463343
I see there is a 3 way tie.

I also see there is an extended deadline..?

It would be a shame if I now voted for Hewitt.

Sorry Hewitt.

#VetoHewitt Final answer
Hewitt

Posts: 14,256
Joined: Jul 2012
Rep: 10

View Profile
Oct 5, 2016 6:35 AM #1463348
Dont you dare hammer, Devour. Give me another day

Hey Wyz, what if we just hammer Active? GMR can hammer Active too, it serves a logical purpose as well.
WyzDM
2

Posts: 2,265
Joined: Jan 2013
Rep: 10

View Profile
Oct 5, 2016 6:37 AM #1463349
Since you're here Hewwit, why turn on me? I mean, you talked about all this good stuff and now you try and stop my final power, meanwhile Exile motions an ability that punishes shields. It makes no sense. I have neen going pretty aggro though so I guess if that is the only reason it's fair.
Hewitt

Posts: 14,256
Joined: Jul 2012
Rep: 10

View Profile
Oct 5, 2016 6:43 AM #1463350
It's a sadistic choice for me, okay? Like crawling through barbed wire. I dont want to vote for GMR. Because tbh not only does it not help me, but he'll just do to me what you're doing to me.

The only optimal way is if we rallied again against a single target.

I'll change to veto Exile if you do.

#veto Exile