She used a powerful spell to resurrect Fell as a modified Draugr, one that was supposed to be the most powerful Draugr of all. Though she succeeded in giving Fell things that most other Draugrs didn’t have, such as the lack of a decaying body and power over the force known as Hugr, it also didn’t give him a lot of abilities that the Draugr were known for, such as the ability to change their size at will.
Maybe its just my Scandinavian blood talking to me, but my blood boils when I read this. Want to know why? Because your using a creature rarely used, the Draugr, and wasting the concept by not using it. You have a powerful creature, a Draugr, with the specific concept that they are evil unstoppable creatures of great power, and you literally just made a shitty undead vampire. So I have to ask, why use it? Why use a Draugr when you clearly didn't try to achieve what it mean to be one? You were clearly just trying to go for a more revenant character, a person who was raised from the dead for some purpose, rather than a person raised from their own evil intent. You even have the gall to reference the other powers but then say he's a "better version". What? Why even? Considering some of the powers that Draugr have, this guy is most definitely not a better version
But you want to use this character? Fine, thats fine, but why use the name Draugr, when this has no little to do with the creature that it pisses me off. It'd be like if I made a character, said he was a Japanese Oni with bare bones connection to the name and then I made him act and seem more like a Nordic Troll. Like why even call him that in the first place.
This isn't anything against you Pitch, in fact, I'm kinda happy Draugr are being used by someone. But this? Not like this. This is not how you use the concept of a Draugr.
