Irony: difference between expectation and reality.
Example: "I sure am going to enjoy this chocolate cake."
"OM NOM NOM"
"there is a piece of metal in this. How ironic."
CORRECT USAGE, PROBLEM SOLVED.
petition about a bandar
Started by: Scarecrow | Replies: 269 | Views: 9,271
Apr 17, 2009 10:41 PM #398940
Apr 17, 2009 10:44 PM #398942
No not really.
Correct Usage:
"In an ironic twist, a cop was indicted today on murder charges"
Correct Usage:
"In an ironic twist, a cop was indicted today on murder charges"
Apr 17, 2009 10:50 PM #398950
Yeah, that. Or a pornstar moving to a city called "Virgin".
Apr 17, 2009 10:55 PM #398953
I said stop making a big dal out of it. Jeez.
Apr 17, 2009 10:58 PM #398956
I don't mean to interfere with your orders, but it's just annoying when people use it wrong.
It's not "opposite of what you actually do expect", it is a state that is only revealed after something happened. It's opposite of what you would not have expected. Yes, that's a huge difference. :/
It's not "opposite of what you actually do expect", it is a state that is only revealed after something happened. It's opposite of what you would not have expected. Yes, that's a huge difference. :/
Apr 17, 2009 11:00 PM #398959
Quote from ManthaI said stop making a big dal out of it. Jeez.
Sorry, didn't know what was going on
Apr 18, 2009 12:54 AM #399026
Quote from ManthaI said stop making a big dal out of it. Jeez.
MANTHA MADE A SPELLING ERROR
OMGOMGOMGOMG
Apr 18, 2009 12:57 AM #399031
Quote from MyselfMANTHA MADE A SPELLING ERROR
OMGOMGOMGOMG
OMGOMGOMGOMGOMGOMGOMGOMGOMGOMGOMGOMGOMG
this isn't combing I truly am surprised at this historic moment.
Apr 18, 2009 2:43 AM #399075
updated list
schall, I wasn't sure if you meant to sign or not
schall, I wasn't sure if you meant to sign or not
Apr 18, 2009 2:45 AM #399076
Oh my signature seems so cool there.
Apr 18, 2009 4:23 AM #399097
Apr 18, 2009 4:32 AM #399100
yo.
Apr 18, 2009 4:43 AM #399108
Quote from KitsuneIdea:
When mods ban you they could have the option to change your signature in the infraction page. The reason they type into the textfield will be set in front of the string: "THIS USER WAS BANNED FOR:" and the whole thing will be bolded and changed to red. The reason will then be on every post the user has on the forum and everyone who first notices through post examination will know the reason immediately.
example:
Myself is banned for "Trolling"
His sig changes to: "THIS USER WAS BANNED FOR: Trolling"
Less work for the mods, less work for the members, just an alteration to the infraction system, which I think this forum's software is capable of.
good idea?
I'm to understand that NO ONE likes this idea?
Because I thought it was pretty solid.
Apr 18, 2009 4:51 AM #399111
the problem there is that the admins have to do extra work to make it happen
Apr 18, 2009 7:21 AM #399166
when you're banned your signature disappears, so that idea isn't practical.