Look, Exilement, I can provide pages and pages of data, and you can deny it all till your blue in the face. If its so tedious to respond, then just stop trying. The only reason to continue is to prove it to yourself because almost everyone else here already believes evolution
The main problem here is that you're doing nothing but posting other people's interpretations of data that you barely understand. You're not responding to my arguments, you're finding arguments that support your ideas and just copying and pasting them here. When I respond to them you just find another wall of text without actually addressing anything I say.
The reason this is becoming tedious is because when I do something like that, I get a response like this:
Please provide a link to some valid source where this has been verified by tests. As far as I remember, we have never actually witnessed that happen, they only think that happened
The worst of it is, what I posted has already been verified. It's a
fact, and it directly contradicts what you were arguing. It was
EXACTLY what you were asking for. You said, find proof that something was added to our genome in a way that provided a beneficial mutation. I provided exactly that, and then you gave this half-assed dismissal of it.
Nothing in that wall of text was even close to conclusive. It's conjecture. The overwhelming majority of geologists believe the coconino sandstone was created from desert winds, not a flood.
I really have no interest in debating with someone who actually believes "evolution itself is just conjecture" while readily holding views that contradict what we know to be true. I can't argue a point if you refuse to acknowledge when you're wrong. I'm not going to keep taking the time to form my own arguments if all you're going to do is ignore them, and then post someone else's arguments, without giving any reason for believing they're true in the first place. It's a waste of time.