So you'd actually say that the human baseline level of happiness and satisfaction is lower now than it was in prehistoric times?
Our minds are hardwired to look for problems. In the absence of any, it creates them out of trivial and meaningless bullshit. But is that a fault of society? Hasn't it solved more problems than its created? Even if it hasn't, aren't we living a better life than someone born 50,000 years ago?
i don't know, i never lived in prehistoric times and i'm not suggesting we go back to them either. my best guess is that we would have been more blissfully ignorant back then, like animals. but we've obviously evolved since then, we developed self-awareness. with that, the ego developed, and then we eventually made everything unnecessarily complicated.
i can't presume that society wasn't necessary, either. surely a set of rules, with currency and education and so on has been useful in allowing us to progress. but that idea has been twisted to the will of a few, and instead of being there simply to maintain order while we progress, it's been made to become like a prison preventing us from evolving further, just so a bunch of select people who are greedy and ambitious enough can stay rich and in power.
my point is that we are getting to the point where we are capable of evolving further (i'm obviously talking about enlightenment), and, incidentally, society is one of the biggest barriers preventing us from doing so.
[edit] i'm going to acknowledge that i am contradicting myself by saying that society has been useful in some ways in advance. i may have been working with hyperboles earlier, or i may have just reconsidered my position. who knows!
i'd also like to mention that our minds
aren't hardwired to look for problems. we are
conditioned to look for problems because it helps us survive in our society. really, there aren't any problems except the ones we make for ourselves